On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:24:14AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Regarding performance, perhaps there can be a convention regarding > splitting input files by year.
A note of warning: last time I checked, file inclusion in Beancount was not (yet) completely transparent. There is stuff you can move to a separate file that you then include (e.g., transactions, account declarations); and stuff that you cannot include and must be in the main file you process if you want it to be effective (e.g., plugins). So if you want your per-year files to behave, semantically, as your entire multi-year ledger, you'll probably have to have *two* files per year, one with the real content + one with the plugin declarations and the include line. The multi-year ledger will have the plugin declarations + one include per year. I remember reading in the doc that this is something that Martin planned to fix, but I don't know if it has happened yet (I'm running a beancount that dates to a few months back). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/20161225082740.skfbejxueummpqfa%40upsilon.cc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
