[BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
Hi BangPypers doesn't have any online channel to discuss. Most of the Open source/Free software projects use IRC as tool for instant communication. Lately, lot of people have asked in meetup and at various places does one exist one for BangPypers. Many organizations like Wordpress [1], gopher [2

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread anu sree
Slack is good, but I think we have to pay to keep chat history. On Aug 15, 2015 8:59 PM, "kracekumar ramaraju" wrote: > Hi > > BangPypers doesn't have any online channel to discuss. Most of the Open > source/Free software projects use IRC as tool for instant communication. > > Lately, lot of peo

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread sayantan bhattacharya
I have not used Slack, but here's an idea that I have. We could always create a custom python module enabling us to have all the functionalities mentioned by Krace. This will in itself become an Open Source contribution as well as can be attributed to 10 years of Bangpypers(an open source framework

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Ankesh Anand
Slack is great, and the only limitation is archives are limited to last 10,000 messages which probably would not be an issue. On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 9:32 PM, sayantan bhattacharya wrote: > I have not used Slack, but here's an idea that I have. We could always > create a custom python module ena

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Chintu Philips Koshy
>> I have not used Slack, but here's an idea that I have. We could always >> create a custom python module enabling us to have all the functionalities >> mentioned by Krace. This will in itself become an Open Source contribution >> as well as can be attributed to 10 years of Bangpypers(an open sour

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Indradhanush Gupta
Slack is good no doubt. But I just don't believe its the right tool for a community. Especially because, it wont be long before we hit the 1 message limit and the 5 free integrations limit. Also, the fact that slack channels are unmoderated goes against its defence for community driven initiat

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
[...] > BTW do take a look at > scrollback.io[1]. > > [1]https://scrollback.io/scrollback > > Scrollback looks totally different concept, create rooms and create discussions. It has IRC/Twitter bridge. Not sure if it can match all features of slack. ___

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Anand B Pillai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 15 August 2015 09:50 PM, Chintu Philips Koshy wrote: >>> I have not used Slack, but here's an idea that I have. We >>> could always create a custom python module enabling us to have >>> all the functionalities mentioned by Krace. This will

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Indradhanush Gupta < indradhanush.gu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Slack is good no doubt. But I just don't believe its the right tool for a > community. Especially because, it wont be long before we hit the 1 > message limit and the 5 free integrations limit. > > Sl

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Sat, Aug 15 2015, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: [...] > Biggest problem with IRC is to on board new comers. The learning curve is > steep for normal tech users. > It only makes life for already acquainted users easier not for new comers. > It hardly takes 5-15 minutes get new person to get used

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread sankarshan
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15 2015, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: > > > [...] > >> Biggest problem with IRC is to on board new comers. The learning curve is >> steep for normal tech users. >> It only makes life for already acquainted users easier not for n

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Sriram Narayanan
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: >- Logging, notification etc. can be handled by one of the various > open source bots out there. We can keep history with as much > scrollback as necessary. Most open source chat rooms do this. > > > See www.echelog.com for

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread sankarshan
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: > [...] > >> BTW do take a look at >> scrollback.io[1]. >> >> [1]https://scrollback.io/scrollback >> >> > Scrollback looks totally different concept, create rooms and create > discussions. It has IRC/Twitter bridge. > Not sure if it can

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Rushabh Mehta
Gitter.im is another good alternative. Is free for open repositories on GitHub and has worked well for us. All you need is to create an organization on GitHub and users would need a GitHub account. -- @rushabh_mehta https://erpnext.com ___ BangPy

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Sun, Aug 16 2015, sankarshan wrote: [...] > An anecdote_of_one: a reason Slack or, Scrollback like services are > often preferred over IRC/email is because of the asynchronous nature > of request-response. For example, you seek some answer and unless you > are logged in, the responses will not

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Vivek Sharma
IRC is nice and cool and u don't have to worry it got apps on android and all other plateforms. And can be modrated at ease. I like this On Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 09:10 Rushabh Mehta wrote: > > > Gitter.im is another good alternative. Is free for open repositories on > GitHub and has worked well fo

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Vivek Sharma wrote: > IRC is nice and cool and u don't have to worry it got apps on android and > all other plateforms. And can be modrated at ease. > I like this > AFAIK having apps in all platforms helps users to stick to the conversation and get notification.

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Haris Ibrahim K. V.
On 16 August 2015 at 10:41, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Vivek Sharma wrote: > >> IRC is nice and cool and u don't have to worry it got apps on android and >> all other plateforms. And can be modrated at ease. >> I like this >> > > AFAIK having apps in all platfo

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
> > [...] > "Surely people who "want to participate and contribute" ..." Let's not > limit these conversations to only those who want to code. > > +1. This will make huge difference. Significant amount of users are on windows and lot prefer web client. Web client has Desktop notification. This is

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread kracekumar ramaraju
> > [...] > Um, is chat an absolute necessity for that? I mean, this mailing list > already does that, right? > > Well idea is not to replace ML. ML is has its place. Like any other project which has both IRC/ML. There are lot of ways it will be useful, one example, Let's say there is an workshop i

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Sun, Aug 16 2015, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: [...] > AFAIK having apps in all platforms helps users to stick to the > conversation and get notification. How awesome will it be if someone > asks a question and gets an answer after 5 hours and notified for it. [...] Kind of like a mailing lis

Re: [BangPypers] Online communication channel

2015-08-15 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Sun, Aug 16 2015, kracekumar ramaraju wrote: >> >> [...] >> "Surely people who "want to participate and contribute" ..." Let's not >> limit these conversations to only those who want to code. >> >> > +1. This will make huge difference. > > Significant amount of users are on windows and lot pref