Re: [BangPypers] turbogears to pyramid or django

2012-02-03 Thread alind sharma
  Alind Sharma From: Pratap Chakravarthy To: Bangalore Python Users Group - India Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012 6:42 AM Subject: Re: [BangPypers] turbogears to pyramid or django As per the following, the turbogears team is itself moving to pyramid

Re: [BangPypers] turbogears to pyramid or django

2012-02-01 Thread Pratap Chakravarthy
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 01:01:00AM +0530, Saju M wrote: >> HI, >> >> I have a project developed in turbogears, i want to move it to Pyramid or >> Django,  which is the best option ??? The web back-end of pyramid is bfg.repoze. The design of pyramid is lot cleaner and there is a ton of documentat

Re: [BangPypers] turbogears to pyramid or django

2012-02-01 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Moving to Pyramid might be easier, because Pyramid is nothing but Pylons + TG + repoze.bfg etc. Pyramid is a unification and based upon some of the ealier framework. You could use sqlalchemy, controller and developmemnt.ini of your existing project out of box for Pyramid (but not for django). I am

[BangPypers] turbogears to pyramid or django

2012-02-01 Thread Saju M
HI, I have a project developed in turbogears, i want to move it to Pyramid or Django, which is the best option ??? I am using following feature of TG2 controller sqlalchemy tg2env developement.ini Not using any template system, since UI developed using EXTJS Reason to this change is, Pylons stop