On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:59 +0530, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
> For a generic scheme
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_India
as already noted, this article is inaccurate. For example 'two tier
cities have a 3 digit code' - I can point out villages that have 3 digit
codes.
>
> But I c
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Dhananjay Nene
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:30 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
>> > look at
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_telephone_numbering_in_India
>> > (But kenneth may h
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:30 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > look at
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_telephone_numbering_in_India
> > (But kenneth may have already looked at this)
>
> no, I had not looked at this - I was
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:30 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> look at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_telephone_numbering_in_India
> (But kenneth may have already looked at this)
no, I had not looked at this - I was not looking for the mobile scheme
which is fairly simple.
--
regards
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 11:23 +0530, Ramdas S wrote:
> Would appreciate if you can tell whether you want a Regex, or is this
> to
> ensure that people enter the right numbers in a form?
regex - for django.contrib.localflavor (I had put something up, but it
only matches my local phone number, so I h
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:03 +0530, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
> So all one really needs to do (say if one wants to call back) is to
> extract
> one single 10 digit number using the above logic by stripping off the
> optional prefixes and the extra characters (which I presume would be
> quite
> trivial).
> So all one really needs to do (say if one wants to call back) is to extract
> one single 10 digit number using the above logic by stripping off the
> optional prefixes and the extra characters (which I presume would be quite
> trivial). But then maybe my mind is not working well today early morni
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:56 +0530, steve wrote:
> I had a bit of time this morning and didn't feel like starting work
> just yet, so
> to amuse myself I completed this.
strangely enough that is how I got into this problem
> Here is the proper regex ...with tests !
>
> http://pastebin.com/yjP5H
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:25 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > > please give me *some* credit for ability to search - those articles
> > are
> > > wildly inaccurate.
> > >
> >
> > Did you mean "out dated" ?
> > Feel free to share
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:25 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > please give me *some* credit for ability to search - those articles
> are
> > wildly inaccurate.
> >
>
> Did you mean "out dated" ?
> Feel free to share the accurate information source (if it is not
> confidential)
I am crowd
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
> Thus there could be the optional prefixes +91 or 0 followed by an
> additional
> sequence of numbers which may have embedded some spaces, hyphens or in rare
> cases parenthesis which are quite ignorable.
>
> So all one really needs to do (sa
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
>
> on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
> forms
>
> 3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
> 4 digit STD code followed by 7 digits
> 5 digit STD code followed by 6 digits
>
> the first digit of the STD
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:56, steve wrote:
> I had a bit of time this morning and didn't feel like starting work just
> yet, so to amuse myself I completed this. Here is the proper regex ...with
> tests !
>
> http://pastebin.com/yjP5H0i2
Neat.
--
http://about.me/rosh
__
On 11/25/2010 06:45 PM, steve wrote:
On 11/25/2010 04:10 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:56 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> r'(^0\d{2}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{7})|(^0\d{3}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{6})|(^0
> \d{4}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{5})'
>
It is doable, but you sh
On 11/25/2010 04:10 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:56 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> r'(^0\d{2}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{7})|(^0\d{3}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{6})|(^0
> \d{4}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{5})'
>
It is doable, but you should really use pyparsing for this - this is
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:55 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > > And any info as to whether my
> > > assumptions as to the landline numbers is correct?
> > >
> >
> > Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_phone_code and
> > http:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 15:11, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> r'(^0\d{2}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{7})|(^0\d{3}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{6})|(^0
> \d{4}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{5})'
>
> any clues on how to make it shorter?
The {1}s are redundant.
--
http://about.me/rosh
___
B
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
>
> on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
> forms
>
> 3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
> 4 digit STD code followed by 7 digits
> 5 digit STD code followed by 6 digits
>
> the first digit of the STD
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:40 +0530, devjyoti patra wrote:
> This is a beautification attempt towards KG's regex
>
> (^0[\d]+)[-\s]{1}([1-6]{1}[\d]{5,7})
0423678 244667 < not a valid number but your regex accepts it
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
_
This is a beautification attempt towards KG's regex
(^0[\d]+)[-\s]{1}([1-6]{1}[\d]{5,7})
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:17 +0530, Lakshman Prasad wrote:
> Rather than flexing the regex to everything it *can do*, I'd do the
> following:
>
> * Capture 2 parts of the number separated by a "-" or a
> whitespace: /^(\d+)[
> \-]+(\d+)$/
> * Use the captured parts to verify the lengths etc, using
Rather than flexing the regex to everything it *can do*, I'd do the
following:
* Capture 2 parts of the number separated by a "-" or a whitespace: /^(\d+)[
\-]+(\d+)$/
* Use the captured parts to verify the lengths etc, using simple normal
python.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalve
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:06 +0530, Ramdas S wrote:
> > It is doable, but you should really use pyparsing for this - this is
> UGLY !
> > :)
> > Meanwhile, let me hack on it.
> >
>
> Regex is ugly. I guess Kenneth being django guy wants to use the
> RegexField
> in django forms
where do I send th
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:56 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> > r'(^0\d{2}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{7})|(^0\d{3}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{6})|(^0
> > \d{4}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{5})'
> >
>
> It is doable, but you should really use pyparsing for this - this is
> UGLY !
I know - but everything I tried to ma
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:55 +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे wrote:
> > And any info as to whether my
> > assumptions as to the landline numbers is correct?
> >
>
> Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_phone_code and
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_India to get
> additional
>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves >wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
> > forms
> >
> > 3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
> > 4
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
>
> on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
> forms
>
> 3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
> 4 digit STD code followed by 7 digits
> 5 digit STD code followed by 6 digits
>
> the first digit of the STD
> And any info as to whether my
> assumptions as to the landline numbers is correct?
>
Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India_phone_code and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_India to get additional
info.
These two URLs also have link to some PDFs from DoT
-Mandar
__
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:32 +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> > r'(^0\d{2}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{7})|(^0\d{3}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{6})|(^0
> > \d{4}[-\s]{1}[1-6]{1}\d{5})'
> >
> > any clues on how to make it shorter? And any info as to whether my
> > assumptions as to the landline numbers is correct?
>
> Th
On Thu, Nov 25 2010, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
>
> on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
> forms
>
> 3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
> 4 digit STD code followed by 7 digits
> 5 digit STD code followed by 6 digits
>
> the first digit of the STD code has to
hi,
on looking at the telephone book, Indian landline numbers have three
forms
3 digit STD code followed by 8 digits
4 digit STD code followed by 7 digits
5 digit STD code followed by 6 digits
the first digit of the STD code has to be 0. The first digit of the
landline number starts from 1-6. Of
31 matches
Mail list logo
