On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Senthil Kumaran writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:05:47PM -0600, Gopalakrishnan Subramani wrote:
>>> Based on my understanding, I may not need PyPy for general programming and
>>> small websites experiments as of now.
>>
>> Just try i
I want to tryout Tornado with MongoDB (AsyncMongo).. I would try pypy as a
runtime.
Thanks for explanation!!
Thanks & Regards,
Gopal
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:12:37PM +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> > Senthil Kumaran writes:
> > > Just
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:12:37PM +0530, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Senthil Kumaran writes:
> > Just try it! Install pypy and symlink your /usr/local/bin/python to
> > pypy interpreter. The whole point is, you won't see the difference.
>
> Unless you use C extensions. :)
>
Depends upon which one a
Senthil Kumaran writes:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:05:47PM -0600, Gopalakrishnan Subramani wrote:
>> Based on my understanding, I may not need PyPy for general programming and
>> small websites experiments as of now.
>
> Just try it! Install pypy and symlink your /usr/local/bin/python to
> pyp
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:05:47PM -0600, Gopalakrishnan Subramani wrote:
> Based on my understanding, I may not need PyPy for general programming and
> small websites experiments as of now.
Just try it! Install pypy and symlink your /usr/local/bin/python to
pypy interpreter. The whole point is,
Thanks Dhananjay for detailed explanation. I spent some more time googling
and their website. Seems to be extended from Psyco project.
Based on my understanding, I may not need PyPy for general programming and
small websites experiments as of now.
Thanks & Regards,
Gopal
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Gopalakrishnan Subramani
wrote:
> I could not understand the PyPy intention in having another run-time.
>
> Can we see having PyPy running Python programs,
>
> 1. As a challenge? (A language can have its own runtime with little
> improved performance) or
> 2. Pote
I could not understand the PyPy intention in having another run-time.
Can we see having PyPy running Python programs,
1. As a challenge? (A language can have its own runtime with little
improved performance) or
2. Potential for future to replace/co-exists CPython forever with strong
community s
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Anand Balachandran Pillai writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> PyPy outperforms C in a little benchmark capitalising on gcc's inability
>>> to optimise across files.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://morepypy.blog
Anand Balachandran Pillai writes:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
>>
>> PyPy outperforms C in a little benchmark capitalising on gcc's inability
>> to optimise across files.
>>
>>
>> http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/08/pypy-is-faster-than-c-again-string.html
>>
>
> N
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> PyPy outperforms C in a little benchmark capitalising on gcc's inability
> to optimise across files.
>
>
> http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/08/pypy-is-faster-than-c-again-string.html
>
Not sure if that is the only factor playing here.
PyPy outperforms C in a little benchmark capitalising on gcc's inability
to optimise across files.
http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/08/pypy-is-faster-than-c-again-string.html
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
Of course I can keep secrets. It's the people I tell them to that can't keep
them.
12 matches
Mail list logo
