On Tuesday 19 August 2014 10:29 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
[snip]
To revive an ancient meme about whom to credit memorable quotes to:
Do not write code. Write code that writes code
I move that this list be renamed to banglispers posthaste.
-Taj.
___
On 10/22/2013 1:10 PM, Saager Mhatre wrote:
[snip]
I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on that last point. I
don't find the MOP implementation in Ruby or Groovy less per for many or
leading to obscure code. On the contrary, I find Python's 'rough-and-ready
tools' make for more confus
On 10/21/2013 11:53 AM, Saager Mhatre wrote:
[snip]
That's pretty much what always foiled my attempts at understanding Python
MetaClasses, I was looking for power where there was none to find. The best
comparison I could find was to Groovy's Compile time AST transforms, but
even those are even m
On 08-Jun-11, at 11:38 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
[snip]
Graphite + statsd/pystatsd is pretty good for performance tracking.
Thanks, I hadn't heard of Graphite before, I've been struggling with
Cacti. I'll give this a try.
We use nagios for availability monitoring. There are many
alterna
Hi all,
I'd like to hear from python web devs on strategies for instrumenting
production wsgi apps for perfomance and availability monitoring. Are
there existing tools that you use? What sort of things do you monitor
(db connection state, response time stats etc) and how intrusive are
the
On 18-May-11, at 6:32 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote:
[snip]
We just follow the client's directive as both almost had similar
performance.
:) Thanks again. I hope you can give us a quick post mortem when
you've had some time to observe it in production.
-Taj.
___
On 18-May-11, at 6:27 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
(FUNCTION TROLL
((FUNCTION PRINT)
"Hello World")))
Please just stop.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
Thanks for the reply, Sree. If I might pick your brain further -
On 18-May-11, at 6:13 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote:
[snip]
We have used it in one large scale project which is due to go live
in next
few days.
What was the reasoning behind choosing it over apache+mod_wsgi? What
are the
Hi all,
I've recently discovered the uWSGI project - http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/
and am hoping to hear from any of you who have had the chance to use
it in production. Specifically:
1. Is nginx+uwsgi easier to use and manage than apache and mod_wsgi?
2. Is there a measurable difference
On 17-May-11, at 8:32 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
You still haven't seen the case I am making? In which case I shall
admit
defeat and rest my case!
Same. And I apologize to all for my part in this trainwreck.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPy
On 17-May-11, at 8:12 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
great! so let us assume for arguments sake, that whatever you say or
pose is
right! What answers do you have have for the questions posed below?
Huh? You started this thread, with the intention of modifying the
behaviour of "young immature id
On 17-May-11, at 5:35 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
First of all, let us get one thing out of the way. Success in
software/hardware, no matter where you are, entirely depends on on
how
passionate you are about it. We can't quantify a person's passion
for some
thing. Apple's success, is St
On 17-May-11, at 6:22 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
Ok let me tell you the whole story scientifically.
"The chances of anyone succeeding with an Open Source Project or
Startup
Company is inversely proportional to the square of the distance
between San
Fransisco and the location of this OpenSou
On 17-May-11, at 1:32 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
In that case why don't you explain your point in a very "coherent"
manner,
so that we lesser mortals get it. What are you saying with respect
to the
subject of this thread?
When you write something like this:
> So my question is, what shit a
On 17-May-11, at 12:59 AM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
I think you must read this thread very carefully again. Where did I
say
anything against FOSS? Where did I say software must be charged?
Don't put
words into my mouth just for your arguments sake.
I could certainly quote bits of your o
On 16-May-11, at 11:51 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote:
[snip]
As long as people like you don't see the problem, India will always
remain
a second class power in the software world. Do you know that the
entire
software exports of India today is only 5% of the total software
exports of
the world? T
On 12-Jan-11, at 7:43 AM, Nitin Kumar wrote:
[snip]
So {} can contain function also for the new class, if then can you
give
example for the same. As i need function to class being generated.
Yes, you can replace the {} with something like
{ 'my_method': some_function }
but the 'some_fun
On 11-Jan-11, at 8:47 PM, Nitin Kumar wrote:
[snip]
So i do know who to create a class and its function dynamically at
runtime???
You can dynamically create a class like this:
NewClass = type('NewClass', (object,), {})
where 'NewClass' is the name of your class, (object,) is any tuple of
s
On 12/6/2010 11:44 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
Man, and here was I thinking that you were killing two birds with one
stone: "To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion".
That's exactly the one I thought about, and figured I'd better clarify
before someone accused me of being arro
On 12/6/2010 11:25 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I sure hope that we don't dismiss the reading of such books just
because "every experienced programmer knows about refactoring".
I apologize if I gave that impression. I think books like these provide
programmers with a head start on techniques an
On 12/4/2010 5:36 PM, Santosh Rajan wrote
[snip]
Let us look at software product development, and let us look at all
the top open source software development projects like linux, apache,
mozilla etc etc. I have not seen refactoring as described by the book
used by any of the open source software
[snip]
[dubious aside: remember this one?
Please note that there is no deeper meaning to be read into the fact
that I mistakenly pasted the quote twice.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On 26-Apr-10, at 5:30 PM, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
[snip]
Taj, the main issue isn't whether standardisation necessary for DSLs
is
feasible - but the sheer amount of effort, time, political
bickerings, and
heat that accompanies it. If one uses python we save that entire
diversion
which if carri
On 26-Apr-10, at 4:47 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote:
[snip]
With all due respect, I disagree that a DSL is useful for this
purpose. In fact, I would disagree with DSLs in most cases, especially
if its supposed to be used for programming. The reason for this is
that creating a good language is muc
On 26-Apr-10, at 3:46 PM, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
[snip]
I think a DSL based contract (or more precisely waterfall
specification) may
be more concise and self descriptive. But that would require a
definition of
a new language grammar. However reasoning about the contracts is
not in the
sco
On 26-Apr-10, at 2:25 PM, Dhananjay Nene wrote:
[snip]
I do see one strong plus here for Python. That is a very natural
language
for expression (as in being one of the most readable programming
languages
for non programmers) without resorting to any specific DSLs etc.
On the contrary, I th
On 27-Jul-09, at 1:50 PM, Shivaraj M S wrote:
[snip]
Can there be a metaclass in python which can change the behaviour of
object at creation stage by extending it and nullifying friend
functions?
(I must confess this is the only sentence in the email that I could
comprehend...)
If wha
Hi all,
I've been trying to find the path of least resistance to using
cooperative multitasking in PyQt apps.
There are a bunch of different options out there, including Twisted
(The initial inqternet.py Qt support I wrote became the basis of the
current Qt reactor, and it works great if
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Ramakrishna Reddy wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> I'm be proposing a Python Bof @ Freed.in. I know Sentil is coming.
> Anyone else coming down ?
I intend to be there on both days.
-Taj.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.
29 matches
Mail list logo
