[Bacula-users] Enable Batch Insert: Solaris

2007-09-28 Thread Weber, Philip
Hi, Sorry if this is something obvious; compilation isn't my forte : I am trying to compile Bacula 2.2.4 on Solaris 9 with MySQL 5.0.41. I am not able to get "configure" to come back with Batch insert enabled. Browsing through the configure file, I wonder if either a) I'm missing something from

[Bacula-users] Compiling 2.2.4 on Solaris

2007-10-01 Thread Weber, Philip
Has anybody successfully compiled Bacula 2.2.4 on Solaris? I have been running 2.0.3 on Solaris 9 for a while, didn't have any particular trouble compiling it with gcc 3.4.6. But I can't compile Bacula 2.2.4, keep getting errors such as : ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written t

Re: [Bacula-users] Compiling 2.2.4 on Solaris

2007-10-02 Thread Weber, Philip
f the configure statement above). So I think my next attempt will be to compile MySQL myself. thanks, Phil > -Original Message- > From: Masopust, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 October 2007 06:30 > To: Weber, Philip; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >

Re: [Bacula-users] Compiling 2.2.4 on Solaris

2007-10-03 Thread Weber, Philip
piles OK with --enable-batch-insert. So I guess, for me at least, a thread-safe version of MySQL is required regardless of whether this option is used. thanks, Phil > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Weber, Philip > S

[Bacula-users] Problem with mtx

2007-10-29 Thread Weber, Philip
Bacula 2.2.4 Solaris 9 Sparc mtx 1.3.9 StorageTek L700 tape library I'm having problems with mtx: once it loads a tape into a drive, "mtx status" then incorrectly reports the slot from which the tape came, e.g. (using mtx via mtx-changer) : $ mtx-changer /dev/changer load 388 /dev/rmt/0cbn 16 L

[Bacula-users] Old versions of Bacula

2007-11-02 Thread Weber, Philip
Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to get hold of old versions of Bacula source (or Solaris packages?). I am struggling to get a File Daemon compiled for Solaris 2.6. It might be lack of intelligence on my part, but it occurs to me that I might have more luck with old source. (And for those

[Bacula-users] Spooling vs Migration

2008-01-02 Thread Weber, Philip
Hi all, Bacula 2.2.4. Solaris 9 Director & Storage Daemons. Mix of Solaris and Windows clients. I am gradually moving some backups onto Bacula (from another backup system) & have noticed that Spooling of backups does not appear to be working as I expected. I have a few 100 Gb set up for spooli

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling vs Migration

2008-01-07 Thread Weber, Philip
Smaller jobs might help, but I would like to keep the simplicity of just being able to throw a new client at Bacula and know that it is getting backed up, without having to delve too deep (initially) into what filesystems are on that client. Thanks all for the feedback. regards, Phil Phil Webe

[Bacula-users] Alerting Tape Errors

2008-01-08 Thread Weber, Philip
Bacula 2.2.4 Solaris 9. Is there a way of configuring Bacula to alert for tape errors like these? I see they are being incorporated in the success/fail email for a job but would like to email them separately so as to highlight them. Obviously I could write a script to parse the log file but don't

Re: [Bacula-users] Alerting Tape Errors

2008-01-08 Thread Weber, Philip
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Drescher Sent: 08 January 2008 17:06 To: Weber, Philip Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Alerting Tape Errors On Jan 8, 2008 11:46 AM, Weber, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with mtx

2008-01-17 Thread Weber, Philip
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weber, Philip Sent: 29 October 2007 14:29 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] Problem with mtx Bacula 2.2.4 Solaris 9 Sparc mtx 1.3.9 StorageTek L700 tape library I'm having pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Beta release of Bacula version 2.2.8

2008-01-18 Thread Weber, Philip
I've fairly recently implemented Bacula on Solaris 9 servers - Director, 2 Storage Daemons, 2 tape libraries, MySQL. I also have a similar test environment which I can get up and running fairly quickly. Should I be running the regression tests either for my own upgrade testing or for the benefit