FWIW the backups sped up considerably and finished after 1.5 days at an
overall transfer rate of about 1.5 MB/s. I'm really not sure what caused the
slowdown yesterday but the eventual speed up seems to imply an environmental
state on the machines that went away. I checked to see if the AV software
On 23/09/10 15:26, Andrés Yacopino wrote:
> I think i am getting worst performance because of ramdon disk access
> speed, is that true?
>
Yes. If you use the time command on your tar process you will find it is
similarly slow.
Actually it's not so much random disk access speed as the fixed tim
> I need to improve performance of a Job which backups 150 files (mail
> and File Server).
> I was compressing the files on disk in some tgz files first (tar and
> gzip) ,then backuping then on tape with Bacula, i was getting about:
>
> Job write elapsed time = 00:32:16, Transfer rate = 44.93 M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Rainer Hackel wrote:
> I have bacula running (version 2.0.2) and in principle everything works =
> fine.
I feel obliged to warn you about that version:
http://www.bacula.org/downloads/bug-395.txt
You should upgrade to 2.2.4 as soon as possi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
>> I have bacula running (version 2.0.2) and in principle everything works =
>> fine.
>> But now (reading some mails from the list) I ask myself why the =
>> backup-speed
>> is that slow. In average it's about 1500 kb/s.
We are
In response to "Rainer Hackel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all!
>
> I have bacula running (version 2.0.2) and in principle everything works =
> fine. But now (reading some mails from the list) I ask myself why the =
> backup-speed is that slow. In average it's about 1500 kb/s.
>
> The software i
> I have bacula running (version 2.0.2) and in principle everything works =
> fine. But now (reading some mails from the list) I ask myself why the =
> backup-speed is that slow. In average it's about 1500 kb/s.
>
Is this an incremental or Differential backup?
John
-
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 12:14, Jonas Björklund wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> > The backup of the Linux servers runs with about 800 kBytes/s
> > (DDS-3 tapes), but the Windows server just returns about 100 kB/s,
> > which is much too slow to backup 15 GB!
>
>
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> The backup of the Linux servers runs with about 800 kBytes/s (DDS-3
> tapes), but the Windows server just returns about 100 kB/s, which is
> much too slow to backup 15 GB!
Have you tried spooling?
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Data_Spoo
