On 12/20/13 05:19, Masopust, Christian wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> maybe OT, but what's the reason against MySQL 5.6 ?
It's a complex update with a lot of major changes, and while Oracle
claims large performance gains, I think they're cheating and basing that
on scaling to larger numbers of cores.
Hi Phil,
maybe OT, but what's the reason against MySQL 5.6 ?
br,
christian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ph...@caerllewys.net]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2013 16:59
> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re:
On 12/19/13 10:26, Mingus Dew wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am migrating my Bacula environment to a new Solaris 10 servers. I
> currently am compiled against MySQL 4.1 and running MySQL 5.1.47 as the
> database.
>
> Can anyone advise me as to what version of MySQL I should compile
> against on
On Tuesday 17 May 2011, Alan Langley elucidated thus:
> UNCLASSIFIED
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting the following error when attempting to start the
> bacula-director on ubuntu.
>
> 17-May 14:05 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: Version error for
> database "bacula". Wanted 10, got 12 17-May 14:05 bacula-
On 05/17/11 21:27, Alan Langley wrote:
> UNCLASSIFIED
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting the following error when attempting to start the
> bacula-director on ubuntu.
>
> 17-May 14:05 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: Version error for database
> "bacula". Wanted 10, got 12 17-May 14:05 bacula-dir JobId 0:
On 2/12/2011 5:41 AM, rst wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is it possible to know the exact version of mysql that
> was used for testing bacula 5.0.3? I'm asking this question
> because some patches of mysql introduce incompatible
> changes.
>
Hi, can you be more specific and state what the
problem/incompa
