On 2013-09-24 20:24, compdoc wrote:
> I appreciate legacy hardware, but I'm a small business with newer x86_64
> hardware as are all of my customers who use mysql, so not really a concern.
What business is that, spamming the net with oracle pr like we aren't
getting enough of it from oracle alre
On 09/24/13 21:24, compdoc wrote:
>> The question that has to be asked, though, is "under what test
> conditions".
>
> Well, I have to assume the tests mean on the same hardware. Which implies
> changes in code.
The problem is that doesn't mean a lot of the test is on hardware on
which the olde
> The question that has to be asked, though, is "under what test
conditions".
Well, I have to assume the tests mean on the same hardware. Which implies
changes in code. The story did mention help from Facebook in the form of
code.
> a customer who's running 5.5 on an 8-core rented server today
On 09/24/13 17:20, compdoc wrote:
> The most obvious improvement in the new release is speed. MySQL engineer
> Tomas Ulin says MySQL 5.7 is 95 per cent faster than MySQL 5.6 and 172 per
> cent faster than version 5.5. The new version can achieve a peak throughput
> of over 500,000 queries per secon
