> The question that has to be asked, though, is "under what test conditions".
Well, I have to assume the tests mean on the same hardware. Which implies changes in code. The story did mention help from Facebook in the form of code. > a customer who's running 5.5 on an 8-core rented server today isn't >going to go out and rent a 128-core server tomorrow to run 5.7 Ideally, if newer versions are faster, one might delay renting that larger server. > MySQL 5.6 is actually slower, core for core and RAM for RAM, than 5.1 on older hardware with the same data. I appreciate legacy hardware, but I'm a small business with newer x86_64 hardware as are all of my customers who use mysql, so not really a concern. To me it means that if I can hang on a little longer I'll be rewarded with speed, and won't have to spend the time converting everything to a different database. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
