On Saturday 13 January 2007 11:32, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Felix Schwarz schrieb:
> > I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforge does not play
nice with
> > crashing UTMS routers and aborted connections. Therefore, some packages
were corrupted so
> > I had to withdraw them:
> >
Felix Schwarz schrieb:
> I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforge does not play
> nice with
> crashing UTMS routers and aborted connections. Therefore, some packages were
> corrupted so
> I had to withdraw them:
> - bacula-client-2.0.0-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
> - bacula-postgresql-2
Mike Seda schrieb:
> I wish to install bacula 2.0.0 on my el4 system. I just have a
> question... What is the difference between the "rpms" and
> "rpms-contrib-fschwarz" links at
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 ? Is there a
> reason why these links are separated?
Hi All,
I wish to install bacula 2.0.0 on my el4 system. I just have a
question... What is the difference between the "rpms" and
"rpms-contrib-fschwarz" links at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 ? Is there a
reason why these links are separated? Basically, which is th
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> That and the fact that their upload process is *extremely* insecure -- it is
> trivial to modify anyone's code, and it would be super trivial to substitute
> a root kit or any other attack without the knowledge of the person releasing
> the files. I informed Source Forge
Alan Brown schrieb:
> One of the other posters has commented on the updatedb problem if a mysql
> root/bacula password is set.
>
> As locking down mysql access is essential for security, I think it would
> be best if the script asked for login/pass before touching mysql
This is one of the p
It would be nice if the rpm upgraded all the databases.
I have 2 catalogs/databases and only one was automatically upgraded.
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
>
>> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The
>> updatedb RPM is a noarch pack
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The
> updatedb RPM is a noarch package (which is only not labeled as such due
> to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb
> packages released by Scott.
One of t
Many thanks Felix :-)
On Monday 08 January 2007 23:01, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
> noarch package (which is only not labeled
> as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the
updatedb pack
Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
noarch package (which is only not labeled
as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb
packages
released by Scott.
I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforg
10 matches
Mail list logo
