Re: [Bacula-users] Winbacula 3.0.3a client vs. 3.0.3 server

2010-01-03 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, On Sun, 03 Jan 2010, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > > 3.0.3a is mentioned here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05607.html > > > > Hmm... it obviously fixes something restore-related. Indeed. In our case, restored files were being incorrectly given the "hidden

Re: [Bacula-users] Winbacula 3.0.3a client vs. 3.0.3 server

2010-01-03 Thread Timo Neuvonen
"Dan Langille" kirjoitti viestissä news:4b40a38f.3090...@langille.org... > Timo Neuvonen wrote: >> I just noticed there are Winbacula 3.0.3a clients, dated 2009-12-15. >> I didn't find any information what this version is... sounds like some >> urgent fix to 3.0.3. It even has the same release not

Re: [Bacula-users] Winbacula 3.0.3a client vs. 3.0.3 server

2010-01-03 Thread Dan Langille
Timo Neuvonen wrote: > I just noticed there are Winbacula 3.0.3a clients, dated 2009-12-15. > I didn't find any information what this version is... sounds like some > urgent fix to 3.0.3. It even has the same release notes- file like 3.0.3, > with no reference to a-suffix. > > AFAIK, Bacula does