Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-26 Thread Fahrer, Julian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. November 2011 18:15 > An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1 > > On 11/24/11 11:01,

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-25 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Fahrer, Julian: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? [...] > > Mediaid 5 & 8 should actually be in status "used". It is 2011-11-24 > 17:00 right now... > Same thing for other pools with "Volume Use Duration = 12 days" > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 11/24/11 11:01, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { > Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool > Pool Type = Backup > Recycle = yes > AutoPrune = yes >

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { >  Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool >  Pool Type = Backup >  Recycle = yes >  AutoPrune

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration not working in 5.2.1

2011-11-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
On 24.11.2011 17:01, Fahrer, Julian wrote: > Hi, > > Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the > pool not working in 5.2.1? > > I defined the pool like this: > --- > Pool { >Name = NEO200S_Weekly_Pool >Pool Type = Backup >Recycle = yes >AutoPrune = yes

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:35, Amiche wrote: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. Bacula changes the status only the next time it wants to use the volume. > So I defined "Volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 8 Jan 2007 at 16:36, James Cort wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the > >> status of > >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > >> So I def

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread James Cort
Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the >> status of >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. >> So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the n

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status > of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job > using > this volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2006-03-17 Thread Ralf Gross
Beren said: > I've got a Volume Use Duration of 23h on my pool, but for some reason > bacula (1.38.5) marks it as used after only a couple of hours after it > starts backing up. Have there been volumes in that pool before you added the 'Volume Use Duration' parameter? If so, you have to update th

Re: Time to Up the debugging leve (WAS: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration = not honored)

2006-02-14 Thread Dan Langille
I remove the ^M's On 14 Feb 2006 at 17:40, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > ...with -d9, here are the relevant decision making parts: > > Without looking at the code, I think this may be a database error > related to: > > mindwipe-dir: postgresql.c:334 my_postgresql_fetch_row finishes > returning

Time to Up the debugging leve (WAS: Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration = not honored)

2006-02-14 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
...with -d9, here are the relevant decision making parts: Without looking at the code, I think this may be a database error related to: mindwipe-dir: postgresql.c:334 my_postgresql_fetch_row finishes returning 8128018^M mindwipe-dir: next_vol.c:62 catreq after find_next_vol ok=1 FW=0^M mindwi

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Use Duration

2005-04-13 Thread David Clymer
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 11:59 +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote: > Hi! > > The manual says that the Pool directive "Volume Use Duration" is only > checked at the end of a job that writes to a volume. > Is there a way to manually trigger this check? (E.g. to mark all > "Appendable" daily volumes as U