On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/20/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> > I thought I fixed this, but apparently not. How
>> should the Volume Status be set in order to cycle through
>> volumes and start over after the last one is used? When
>> the above
--- On Thu, 5/20/10, John Drescher wrote:
> >
> > I thought I fixed this, but apparently not. How
> should the Volume Status be set in order to cycle through
> volumes and start over after the last one is used? When
> the above failure occurred, all my Volume Status's were
> "Used".
> >
>
> A
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>>
>> Once purged, you can either let Bacula recycle them itself,
>> or you can
>> use the Update Volume command to manually change the volume
>> status to
>> Recycle. This is a particularly s
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Once purged, you can either let Bacula recycle them itself,
> or you can
> use the Update Volume command to manually change the volume
> status to
> Recycle. This is a particularly straightforward
> operation if you are
> using BAT, since you can
--- On Thu, 4/22/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 4:02 PM
> On 04/22/10 17:47, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> > -
--- On Thu, 4/22/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 4:04 PM
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> I am still testing, using "run" at the bconsole, and selecting:
>> 2: BackupCatalog
>>
>> I've run it a few times in one hour, and I see it appending the backup to
>> the same volume. Is this because the runs are happening too fast (sa
On 04/22/10 17:47, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>>
>> Joseph,
>>
>> That looks much better. Now your volumes have the
>> correct nine days
>> retention time for your desired ten-day cycle, instead of
>> zero, so your
>> jobs will actually be kept around i
> I am still testing, using "run" at the bconsole, and selecting:
> 2: BackupCatalog
>
> I've run it a few times in one hour, and I see it appending the backup to the
> same volume. Is this because the runs are happening too fast (same cycle)?
> The setting:
>
> Volume Use Duration = 23h
>
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Joseph,
>
> That looks much better. Now your volumes have the
> correct nine days
> retention time for your desired ten-day cycle, instead of
> zero, so your
> jobs will actually be kept around instead of being pruned
> as soon as
> they complete
Phil Stracchino schrieb:
> > The /usr slice is about 4.8G, and shouldn't be changing-- at least
> > not at the tune of 51M every night.
>
>
> "Shouldn't" is a powerful word. You might want to test the theory by
> doing something like this:
>
> find /usr /opt/bacula/bin -mtime -1 -ls
>
> to lis
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 5:53 PM
> On 04/21/10 19:42, John Drescher
> wrote:
> >&
On 04/21/10 19:42, John Drescher wrote:
>> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-sd JobId 183: Job write elapsed time = 00:00:01,
>> Transfer rate = 51.14 M Bytes/second
>> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-dir JobId 183: Bacula backula-dir 5.0.1 (24Feb10):
>> 19-Apr-2010 23:10:04
>> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-li
On 04/21/10 19:18, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>> From: John Drescher
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
>> To: "Joseph Spenner"
>> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> D
> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-sd JobId 183: Job write elapsed time = 00:00:01,
> Transfer rate = 51.14 M Bytes/second
> 19-Apr 23:10 backula-dir JobId 183: Bacula backula-dir 5.0.1 (24Feb10):
> 19-Apr-2010 23:10:04
> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat
> JobId: 183
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 12:10 PM
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> Here are the file sizes (in date order):
>>
>> 7009019184 Apr 14 23:21 disk_0003
>> 51149798 Apr 15 23:10 disk_0004
>> 51159533 Apr 16 23:10 disk_0005
>> 51167844 Apr 17 23:10 disk_0006
>> 51177531 Apr 18 23:10 disk_0001
>> 51182974
> Here are the file sizes (in date order):
>
> 7009019184 Apr 14 23:21 disk_0003
> 51149798 Apr 15 23:10 disk_0004
> 51159533 Apr 16 23:10 disk_0005
> 51167844 Apr 17 23:10 disk_0006
> 51177531 Apr 18 23:10 disk_0001
> 51182974 Apr 19 23:10 disk_0002
>
> There shouldn't be 51M+ of updates
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 11:38 AM
> > 17-Apr 23:05 backul
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Start Backup JobId 175,
> Job=DefaultBackupClient.2010-04-17_23.05.00_23
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Max configured use duration exceeded.
> Marking Volume "disk_0005" as Used.
> 17-Apr 23:05 backula-dir JobId 175: Recycled volume "disk_0006"
> 17-A
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> From: Joseph Spenner
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 7:04 PM
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher
>
> wrote:
> >
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
> >
> >
> > OK, my next backup ran and it used the next volume.
> Success!
> > However.. it "appended". Here's what my volumes look
> like now:
> >
> > *list volumes
> > Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
> > Using Catalog "MyCatalog"
> > Pool: De
On 04/14/10 19:38, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> OK, my next backup ran and it used the next volume. Success!
> However.. it "appended". Here's what my volumes look like now:
>
> *list volumes
> Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
> Using Catalog "MyCatalog"
> Pool: Default
> No results to list.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>>
>> Once purged, you can either let Bacula recycle them itself,
>> or you can
>> use the Update Volume command to manually change the volume
>> status to
>> Recycle. This is a particularly st
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Once purged, you can either let Bacula recycle them itself,
> or you can
> use the Update Volume command to manually change the volume
> status to
> Recycle. This is a particularly straightforward
> operation if you are
> using BAT, since you can
On 04/14/10 14:01, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Phil:
> I believe I purged the volumes correctly, but not sure how to 'recycle'
> volumes..?
>
> Here's what it looks like now:
>
> ===
> *list media pool=File
> +-++---+-+---+--+--+-
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Joseph,
>
> That looks much better. Now your volumes have the
> correct nine days
> retention time for your desired ten-day cycle, instead of
> zero, so your
> jobs will actually
On 04/14/10 10:55, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>
>> Post the output of list media pool=File
>>
>> John
>
> John:
> Here are results:
>
> ===
> *list media pool=File
> +-++---+-+---+--+
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
> Post the output of list media pool=File
>
> John
John:
Here are results:
===
*list media pool=File
+-++---+-+---+--+--+-+--+---+---+-
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>
>>
>> You need to execute the two update commands that Phil asked
>> you about.
>>
>>
>> update
>>
>
> Ok, I ran the commands. I'll see what happens tonight. Anything else I
> should run to
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
> You need to execute the two update commands that Phil asked
> you about.
>
>
> update
>
Ok, I ran the commands. I'll see what happens tonight. Anything else I should
run to verify?
Thanks!
-
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:06 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Spenner
>> wrote:
>>> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>>
Can you post the output of list media
John
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:06 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Can you post the output of list media
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>
>> John:
>> Here's the results of "list media"
>>
>> ===
>> *list
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Can you post the output of list media
>>
>> John
>>
>
> John:
> Here's the results of "list media"
>
> ===
> *list media
> Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
> Using Catalog "MyCat
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>
> Did you Update the pools from the resources, and the
> volumes from the pools?
>
> What do the 'List Volumes' and 'Show Pools' commands
> return?
>
Phil:
Sorry. I did not do that. So, I just now did the "update the pools". As
far as "vol
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
> Can you post the output of list media
>
> John
>
John:
Here's the results of "list media"
===
*list media
Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
Using Catalog "MyCatalog"
Pool: Default
No results to list.
Pool: File
+-++
On 04/14/10 07:51, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Phil:
> I just realized a typo. I meant to say it's still using the same file
> every night. I also just noticed something after the post-- the "appending"
> information in the log below. So, it's not re-writing over the top of the
> same file ever
> I just realized a typo. I meant to say it's still using the same file every
> night. I also just noticed something after the post-- the "appending"
> information in the log below. So, it's not re-writing over the top of the
> same file every night; it's appending to it-- and not using a "n
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > File Retention = 1 days
> > Job Retention = 6 months
> > }
> > ===
> >
> > Is the client specific "File Retention" causing my
> problem?
>
> Yes, that's exactly the problem.
>
> >I'm also a bit confused (obviously) with:
> >File Retention
>
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > File Retention = 1 days
> > Job Retention = 6 months
> > }
> > ===
> >
> > Is the client specific "File Retention" causing my
> problem?
>
> Yes, that's exactly the problem.
>
> >I'm also a bit confused (obviously) with:
> > File Retentio
On 04/12/10 11:58, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Mon, 4/12/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>
>> Did you fix the retention period yet? If it's
>> immediately reusing the
>> first volume, it probably means your retention is too
>> short. If you're
>> trying to use these volumes in daily rotation, the
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Did you fix the retention period yet? If it's
> immediately reusing the
> first volume, it probably means your retention is too
> short. If you're
> trying to use these volumes in daily rotation, then the
> volume use
> duration should be set so t
On 04/11/10 23:14, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Phil:
> Thanks for the help! Getting closer. It's not breaking up the backup, but
> now it uses the same file/device every night. Maybe the "Volume Use
> Duration" is too short?
Did you fix the retention period yet? If it's immediately reusing the
--- On Fri, 4/9/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Using removable SATA disks as media
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 12:47 PM
> On 04/09/10 11:57, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> > Ph
On 04/09/10 11:57, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Phil:
> Thanks for the reply. Here's my Pool and Storage defs:
>
> =
> # Definition of file storage device
> Storage {
> Name = File
> Address = backula-va
> SDPort = 9103
> Password = "somepass"
> Device = FileStorage
> Media Type = Fi
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/08/10 14:05, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> > But when the backup runs at the default time, it uses
> a different disk_ file for each system being backed up
> on the same day. So, in 1 day, client 1 will use
> disk_0001 and client 2 will use dis
On 04/08/10 14:05, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> But when the backup runs at the default time, it uses a different disk_
> file for each system being backed up on the same day. So, in 1 day, client 1
> will use disk_0001 and client 2 will use disk_0002. I would want client 1,
> client 2, and all
47 matches
Mail list logo
