Hello Robert,
I´m affraid the "spool directory" is a device directive. I have it
configured in my device:
Device {
...
Spool Directory = /opt/bacula/spool
Maximum Spool Size = 20 G
}
Best regards,
Ana
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Robert A Threet
wrote:
> Ok, I greatly increased my sp
Ok, I greatly increased my spool sizes. It appears to be placing the
spool in /opt/bacula/working (I'm using BaculaSystems 6). I read there
was a "Spool Directory = " parameter. I put it in the Tape Pool definition.
After doing that, bacula wouldn't start. I have about 4-6TB of disk I wish
to
>> Compare against a stock, non tuned, Bacula install. Are you
>> going between building where you get the slow transfer speed?
>> UCSC has 1 Gb links between buildings from my recollection. The
>> link to the outside world is not much more than that. Bacula
>> also has a batch mode which you can
> Without attribute spooling or batch (not sure if that
> is postgres only) after each file is read the database
> needs to add records.
We have attribute spooling activated right now.
Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
---
>> Is the MySQL database storage on the same RAID array you are
>> writing backups to?
>
> Yes and no. Currently, in our "dev" environment, they are both on the same
> physical RAID array, but Bacula operates in a separate jail from mySQL. When
> we move to production, the director will probabl
I'm going to try to reply to all the responses I got together.
> Have you tried backing up other hosts on your network? What are
> the speeds with these hosts? I've noticed that different host
> respond with varying speeds despite being on the same network.
> Wondering if this has to do the client
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:37:32 +0200, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> However, we're getting pretty pitiful throughput numbers. When I scp a
> file from my workstation to the Bacula server, I get something like
> 40MB/s (320Mb/s). When Bacula runs, we're lucky to get 20MB/s
> (160Mb/s), and we often
On 04/10/10, Tim Gustafson (t...@soe.ucsc.edu) wrote:
> ...we're getting pretty pitiful throughput numbers. When I scp a file
> from my workstation to the Bacula server, I get something like 40MB/s
> (320Mb/s). When Bacula runs, we're lucky to get 20MB/s (160Mb/s), and
> we often get numbers clos
On 10/4/2010 1:37 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
> SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
> box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
> Adaptec RAID control
On 10/4/10 10:37 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
> SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
> box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
> Adaptec RAID controller
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
> SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
> box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
> Adaptec RAI
Tim,
Have you tried backing up other hosts on your network? What are the speeds with
these hosts? I've noticed that different host respond with varying speeds
despite being on the same network. Wondering if this has to do the client OS
doing some throttling based on work load.
JJ
-Origina
12 matches
Mail list logo
