Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore

2009-02-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, You are running a pretty old version of Bacula, and it appears you have used encryption on Win32 (not specified). If I remember right, the first releases with encryption had a problem with encryption signatures failing on Win32 because Microsoft does not restore files bit for bit when do

Re: [Bacula-users] problem with restore

2008-01-17 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You should upgrade, if you are starting fresh. 2.2.7 is the latest stable version. In addition, you should show what the btape tests showed, assuming you ran them (which I think is a safe assumption in this case). Perez wrote: > Bacula 2.0.3 (06Mar07

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore...

2007-10-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, there's really no need to post your questions that often. It only annoys the people who spend their time helping others. If, after several days, nobody replied a short reminder is usually considered appropriate. Please try to follow the usual guidelines on mailing list etiquette which you

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore

2006-05-22 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, apart from Dan's answer- On 5/22/2006 11:25 PM, Naira Kaieski wrote: ... # Storages Storage { Name = storage-naira Address = 172.17.5.1 Password = "senha-storage" Device = device-naira Media Type = File } Storage { Name = storage-artemis

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore

2006-05-22 Thread Dan Langille
On 22 May 2006 at 18:25, Naira Kaieski wrote: > Hi, > > I have instaled the Bacula 1.38.9 and i have problems with restore files. > > I have a machine that is my backup server and client (naira) with bacula > and an other machine with bacula-client (artemis). > > The backups for two machines is OK

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
Most likely you did not try to restore from both devices ... On Wednesday 09 November 2005 23:29, Yann Cézard wrote: > Kern Sibbald a écrit : > >Restores are done by client, so the restore command doesn't know what Job > >did the backup, and so it probably because it takes the first storage > > de

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-09 Thread Yann Cézard
Kern Sibbald a écrit : Restores are done by client, so the restore command doesn't know what Job did the backup, and so it probably because it takes the first storage device that matches the Media Type. If you assign a different Media Type to each of your Devices, this will not happen. Th

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-09 Thread Michael Galloway
the mod option did indeed work for me ... -- michael On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:29:54PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:43, Yann Cézard wrote: > > Kern Sibbald a écrit : > > Job not run. > > -- > > > > Restores are done by client, so the restore command

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:43, Yann Cézard wrote: > Kern Sibbald a écrit : > >On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:27, Yann Cézard wrote: > >>Hi list, > > > >Yes, in 1.38 if you use overrides, they will be applied after the job is > >started. There is currently no way to override the overrides f

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-09 Thread Yann Cézard
Kern Sibbald a écrit : On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:27, Yann Cézard wrote: Hi list, Yes, in 1.38 if you use overrides, they will be applied after the job is started. There is currently no way to override the overrides from the command line. Ok, but the problem is that my

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore in bconsole

2005-11-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:27, Yann Cézard wrote: > Hi list, Yes, in 1.38 if you use overrides, they will be applied after the job is started. There is currently no way to override the overrides from the command line. > > I'm currently migrating from 1.36.3 to 1.38.0, but I have a big pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore - GDB traceback

2005-04-25 Thread Ogee
There is GDB traceback, hope it helps. --ogee [New Thread 1024 (LWP 2365)] 0xb7edca59 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 $1 = "bacula-sd", '\0' $2 = 0x8097040 "bacula-sd" $3 = 0x8097068 "/opt/bacula/sbin/bacula-sd" $4 = "PostgreSQL" $5 = 0x8084131 "1.36.0 (20 October 2004)" $6 = 0x808414a "i686-pc-li

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore

2005-04-25 Thread Ogee
Try starting the Storage daemon with a -p option. It will then ignore certain errors -- however, when you are getting checksum errors, something has gone wrong and the SD will most likely either give up or crash. I try so, but the same error again. Unfortunately, I can't restore any file, becau

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with restore

2005-04-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 25 April 2005 10:44, Ogee wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to the list, but I use bacula for a while. Such a good piece > of software. ;-) > > I have today a problem with restore a file from backup. > > <=== > lekarna1-dir: Start Restore Job RestoreFiles.2005-04-25_09.22.37 > lekarna1-sd