Date: 3/13/20 15:55 (GMT+01:00) To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] New tape drive Does anyone have recommendations for
MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE for a LTO-7 tape drive (HP). We are currently using 2M on
the LTO-5 with success (and it seemed to improve the speed). I
On 13/03/2020 14:51, Steven Hammond wrote:
> Does anyone have recommendations for MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE for a LTO-7
> tape drive (HP). We are currently using 2M on the LTO-5 with success
> (and it seemed to improve the speed). I didn't know if there was a
> better setting for the LTO-7 (e.g., 4M) th
Does anyone have recommendations for MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE for a LTO-7 tape
drive (HP). We are currently using 2M on the LTO-5 with success (and it
seemed to improve the speed). I didn't know if there was a better
setting for the LTO-7 (e.g., 4M) that should be used. Any suggestions?
Steven Ha
Ok, I didn't know if it was being stored internally in the database for
the tapes (e.g., tape volume Daily-1 was associated in the catalog with
storage device LTO-5). Thanks.
Steven Hammond
On 3/10/2020 12:38 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 11/03/2020 02:26, Steven Hammond wrote:
We are curren
On 11/03/2020 02:26, Steven Hammond wrote:
We are currently using a LTO-5 drive. We are upgrading to a LTO-7
drive. I noticed the directive in our pools STORAGE=LTO-5. I'd like the
existing pools to use LTO-7 (since it can still read LTO-5 tapes). Can
I just change the directive in the pool
