Hi,
On 3/1/2007 2:57 AM, Zeratul wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:06:20 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote
> ...
>
>>A configuration setting for the timeout time would be fine :-)
>>Hmm, perhaps in the console resource in the DIR conf?
>
>
> Someone (Kern, if I remember right) told in a previous thread t
On Thursday 01 March 2007 02:57, Zeratul wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:06:20 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote
> ...
>
> > A configuration setting for the timeout time would be fine :-)
> > Hmm, perhaps in the console resource in the DIR conf?
>
> Someone (Kern, if I remember right) told in a previous th
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:06:20 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote
...
>
> A configuration setting for the timeout time would be fine :-)
> Hmm, perhaps in the console resource in the DIR conf?
Someone (Kern, if I remember right) told in a previous thread that the
restricted consoles are actually jobs. Ther
Hi,
On 2/28/2007 8:07 PM, Zeratul wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:07:09 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
> ...
>
>>No -- that would require some sort of Feature Request, and in fact,
>> I don't really know how to do it correctly.
>>
>>Each console should get the "messages" or answers to queries and
>>c
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:07:09 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
...
>
> No -- that would require some sort of Feature Request, and in fact,
> I don't really know how to do it correctly.
>
> Each console should get the "messages" or answers to queries and
> commands that it generates (not necessarily inc
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 22:39, Zeratul wrote:
> Hi
>
> Having 2 or more consoles opened to bacula directory, only one console gets
> the messages. There is any way to send the messages to all opened consoles?
No -- that would require some sort of Feature Request, and in fact, I don't
really k
