Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

Just giving my 2cents here: I solved the same problem you're having by using the /etc/hosts file... In bacula-dir configs, the I've configured the FD Address parameter with the FQDN of the bacula-sd server, and on the bacula-fd client, using the hosts file, I've pointed the FQDN to the IP of the f

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:18:46 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > One of your basic assumptions is incorrect. I don't know what it is, but > something, somewhere is wrong. > > Verify that your bacula-dir.conf configuration is correct. I'd add: Verify that your bacula-dir.conf configuration is

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > It's set to files dns, if I ping the hostname it comes up as 127.0.0.1. > There's no way that this could be known by the 172.17.x.x address unless the > Director was translating it and passing it over - there's not even a > 172.x.x.x addres

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

It's set to files dns, if I ping the hostname it comes up as 127.0.0.1. There's no way that this could be known by the 172.17.x.x address unless the Director was translating it and passing it over - there's not even a 172.x.x.x address configured on the client machine. I'm really confused here, a

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:49:01 -0400, Kevin O'Connor said: > > Yeah, absolutely. There's no reference in any of my configs anywhere (dir, > sd, fd) on either machine to that IP, so it makes me think the Director is > resolving it, using that value internally, and then passing that over the >

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

23.6.2011 18:49, Kevin O'Connor kirjoitti: > > > 2011/6/23 Jari Fredriksson mailto:ja...@iki.fi>> > > 23.6.2011 4:28, Dan Langille kirjoitti: > > > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dan Langille

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

2011/6/23 Jari Fredriksson > 23.6.2011 4:28, Dan Langille kirjoitti: > > > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > >> On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > >>> > My setup is as follows: > > >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

23.6.2011 4:28, Dan Langille kirjoitti: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >>> My setup is as follows: Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Se

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

2011/6/23 Kevin O'Connor : > So I've followed that SSH tunneling article, but I see that the FD on the > remote server outside of the firewall is trying to connect to 172.16.x.x, > which is what the SD resolves to inside of our network.  I've followed the > instructions in the article to add the SD

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

2011/6/23 Kevin O'Connor : > So I've followed that SSH tunneling article, but I see that the FD on the > remote server outside of the firewall is trying to connect to 172.16.x.x, > which is what the SD resolves to inside of our network.  I've followed the > instructions in the article to add the SD

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >> >> > My setup is as follows: >> > >> > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) >> > >> > The FD is ac

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

So I've followed that SSH tunneling article, but I see that the FD on the remote server outside of the firewall is trying to connect to 172.16.x.x, which is what the SD resolves to inside of our network. I've followed the instructions in the article to add the SD FQDN to /etc/hosts to make it reso

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > My setup is as follows: > > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) > > The FD is accessible from anywhere, but the DIR/SD is not (NAT/FW). > > When I start the backup, the Director connects to the FD without

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

Hi, On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > I understand how it's supposed to work (FD to SD), that's why I'm asking if > there was some cryptic config option or something I was missing to make it > do the reverse. It exists as Active/Passive in FTP, so it's not too crazy > to think somethi

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

I understand how it's supposed to work (FD to SD), that's why I'm asking if there was some cryptic config option or something I was missing to make it do the reverse. It exists as Active/Passive in FTP, so it's not too crazy to think something similar might exist for Bacula. I guess not though.

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

Hi, On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) > > The FD is accessible from anywhere, but the DIR/SD is not (NAT/FW). > > When I start the backup, the Director connects to the FD without a problem, > but then when the Dir

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:11:21 -0400 "Kevin O'Connor" wrote: > My setup is as follows: > > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) > > The FD is accessible from anywhere, but the DIR/SD is not (NAT/FW). > > When I start the backup, the Director connects to the FD w

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

2011/6/20 Kevin O'Connor : > My setup is as follows: > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) > The FD is accessible from anywhere, but the DIR/SD is not (NAT/FW). > When I start the backup, the Director connects to the FD without a problem, > but then when the Direc

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

OpenVPN ? 2011/6/20 Kevin O'Connor : > My setup is as follows: > Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (FD) > The FD is accessible from anywhere, but the DIR/SD is not (NAT/FW). > When I start the backup, the Director connects to the FD without a problem, > but then whe

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall traversal

I have a similar setup. Can you add a rule in the firewall that will allow the FD access to the SD. That's what I did in order to get my backups to work. On 6/20/2011 9:11 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: My setup is as follows: Bacula Server (DIR, SD) -> Firewall/NAT -> Server to be backed up (F