On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Christoff Buch wrote:
>> Bacuka has the ability to already run simultaneous jobs on different
tape
>> drives and spool them to disk.
>> Despooling is triggered by the spool file reaching maximum size,
or the
>> spool disk area exceeding maximum size.
>
> => What exactl
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Christoff Buch wrote:
>> Bacuka has the ability to already run simultaneous jobs on different tape
>> drives and spool them to disk.
>> Despooling is triggered by the spool file reaching maximum size, or the
>> spool disk area exceeding maximum size.
>
> => What exactly do you
Am Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:27 +0100 (BST) schrieb Alan Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christoff Buch wrote:
>
>> Might I add a few lines I've already added to Rumkos original mail
>> before?:
>>
>> Spooling is very good, but shouldn't slow down backup since this affects
>> per-n
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christoff Buch wrote:
> Might I add a few lines I've already added to Rumkos original mail
> before?:
>
> Spooling is very good, but shouldn't slow down backup since this affects
> per-night-capacity.
>
> Also, I thought about simultaneous jobs going on several drives of one
>
> > One possibility in continuing spooling would be to introduce "multiple"
> > spool
> > directories or some way to partition a spool directory so that it would say
> > fill half-way and then begin despooling while the other half could continue
> > spooling.
> What about a configurable setting? S
Hello again,
Might I add a few lines I've already
added to Rumkos original mail before?:
Spooling is very good, but shouldn't slow down backup
since this affects
per-night-capacity.
Also, I thought about simultaneous jobs going on several drives of one
machine at a time:
Could it be done to g
On 6/22/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not likely to accept the Feature request as it stands (perhaps after some
> changes) for the following two reasons:
>
> 1. You mention that this feature will prolong the tape's lifetime, but I see
> no impovement in this regard o
Hello,
I am not likely to accept the Feature request as it stands (perhaps after some
changes) for the following two reasons:
1. You mention that this feature will prolong the tape's lifetime, but I see
no impovement in this regard over the current code.
2. Once the spool file fills, it is ful
