Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2014-06-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 06/12/2014 05:38 PM, Thomas Lohman wrote: > I've seen this error before on and off on one particular client. > Nothing changes with regard to the configuration and yet the error will > crop up. Usually a combination of the following "fixes" it - > cancel/restart the job, restart the Bacula c

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2014-06-12 Thread Thomas Lohman
I've seen this error before on and off on one particular client. Nothing changes with regard to the configuration and yet the error will crop up. Usually a combination of the following "fixes" it - cancel/restart the job, restart the Bacula client, or restart the Bacula storage daemon. Since

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2014-06-12 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Benjamin, Do you have localhost in any of your bacula conf files? Regards, Ana On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, benji49320 wrote: > Hi, > > I've problem with my Bacula server and my FD on my client-test server > (centos6-fd). When I try to run a job with BAT I've the following error : > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-24 Thread Kevin B. Zimmerman
Hi Ana - Thanks for your reply. What we discovered was the implementation of rp_filter in Ubuntu 12.04 prevented packets from flowing like we expected. While this behavior is good in general, it stopped traffic from going through where we wanted it. Once that was disabled, things started wo

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-22 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Kevin, Yes, that´s the way bacula works. It "ties" volumes to devices. But you´re having this behaviour because of your configuration. Maybe you should take a look at vchanger. There is a very good discussion about vchanger and bacula disk-changer: http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-21 Thread Kevin B. Zimmerman
Hi Ana - Thanks for responding. I currently have no issues communicating between the public-fd client and the storage daemon at 192.168.120.35. I'm able to connect between both addresses on ports 9102 and 9103. As far as the JobID, I pass the specific job to the console during the restore.

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2013-09-20 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Kevin, Just trying to understand... The error bellow: Restore-public-Disk.2013-09-20_12.43.48_32 is waiting for Client to connect to Storage daemon ... 20-Sep 12:19 public-fd JobId 19084: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon. Please seehttp://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2012-06-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:11:53 -0700, tomse said: > > The above message is now shown after upgrading from 5.1.x to 5.2.6 > > Doing a manual backup using same jobs etc it works perfectly. > So keys are good. > > This only occurs with the automatic backup running through a SSH Tunnel > (foll

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2012-06-12 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11:53AM -0700, tomse wrote: > The above message is now shown after upgrading from 5.1.x to 5.2.6 > > Doing a manual backup using same jobs etc it works perfectly. > So keys are good. > > This only occurs with the automatic backup running through a SSH > Tunnel (followi

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2012-05-09 Thread Arnau Coll :: Puntdoc
Hi guys, I tried to reinstall Bacula client, setting Maximum Network Buffer Size to 32768 at file daemon and storage daemon , but still have the same error. Anyone has any ideas? Thanks, Arnau De: Arnau Coll [mailto:ac...@puntdoc.es] Enviado el: martes, 08 de mayo de 2012 12:31 Para:

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon

2012-05-08 Thread dpoggi
--Duilio Poggi OnetoEnviado usando Nextel EmailFrom: "Arnau Coll" Date: Tue May 08 10:51:16 GMT 2012To: "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon Hi guys,   I recently have this error with one of my Windows 2003 servers.

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-29 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Solved :) I found the problem. It was my tcp wrapper rules -- as earlier I didn't realize the storage daemon communicated directly with the file daemon. (As I thought all traffic went though director.) A reply on this thread clarified this for me. (Thanks!) But I didn't fix my /etc/hosts.allow

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-29 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Now that debugging is working (see my patch in other thread), I have some more details: a1-fd: filed.c:238 filed: listening on port 9102 a1-fd: cram-md5.c:52 send: auth cram-md5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ssl=0 a1-fd: cram-md5.c:68 Authenticate OK Q2thJ6+M/8ICB4g41H+BoB a1-fd: cram-md5.c:114 sending re

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
My bacula-sd.conf only has one password defined in a Director container. This is the same password as in my Storage container in my bacula-dir.conf. I have a Client container that has the password that matches the password in the Directory container in the client's bacula-fd.conf. I just look

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
On 11/28/06, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.43 Fatal error: Authorization > > > key > > > rejected by Storage daemon. Please see > > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.43 Fatal error: Authorization > > > key > > > rejected by Storage daemon. Please see > > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors for help. > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.4

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
On 11/28/06, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am using bacula version 1.38.11 on CentOS. > > I have a server that is running bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd. > As far as I can tell the default bacula backups are working f

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> What is this "Authorization key"? It is not mentioned in the manual. And I > don't see anything related in the "Storage Configuration Daemon" chapter. > > I am still reading the very long manual :) I found this in the source at authenticate_storagedaemon() in src/filed/authenticate.c. It says