On Monday 05 June 2006 21:41, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2006 at 21:32, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > If you cannot build a statically linked FD, then you can still do a
> > bare metal recovery by simply reloading your OS from CDs or whatever
> > then using a pre-built dynamically linked Bacula FD to
On 5 Jun 2006 at 21:32, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> If you cannot build a statically linked FD, then you can still do a
> bare metal recovery by simply reloading your OS from CDs or whatever
> then using a pre-built dynamically linked Bacula FD to restore the
> user files and modified system files -- a
This email is interesting for a number of reasons. First, I never got the
original email, so something is flaky.
A statically linked SD should never be necessary for a bare metal recovery.
If you only have one machine, you must somehow reload the OS before
continuing and a Bacula Rescue disk
> I know that it must not be required, because bare metal recovery is
> possible on Solaris, and a statically compiled fd apparently isn't.
>
> That said, I know of no such problem on Linux and that will likely make
> your life a little bit easier. Can't 'yum' be used to find this RPM (not
> TOO fa
I know that it must not be required, because bare metal recovery is
possible on Solaris, and a statically compiled fd apparently isn't.
That said, I know of no such problem on Linux and that will likely make
your life a little bit easier. Can't 'yum' be used to find this RPM (not
TOO familiar w
