Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:31:54 +0100, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> Please find below the extract from the Bacula website( >> http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Catalog_Maintenance.html#SECTION0024 >> 8 >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

set (0.00 sec) > > >>From above it looks like we do satify the point no ii> . But not point > no. i>. i.e. "Filename, you have an index with Key_name "Name" and > Sub_part "255". > Will it make any major difference ?? > > Thanks. > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

quot;Name" and Sub_part "255". Will it make any major difference ?? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009 08:47 To: Dan Langille; Michael Galloway; Josh Fisher; John Drescher Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

. -Original Message- From: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org] Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2009 21:58 To: Michael Galloway Cc: John Drescher; Josh Fisher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Michael Galloway wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Michael Galloway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the system level full backup. I usually advise against system level full backups. I recommend a prope

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

> so, would it be considered a 'best practice' to have the catalog database > server that is on > a separate machine that the bacula server? > I have the database on a different server than the director but just not having it on the same raid that you backup the most frequently would be fine. Alt

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: > >> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the > >> system level full backup. > >> > > > > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored > > on the same file system that is being

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jean Gobin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > If you're using the default name, Linux/Unix AND using sqlite: > With his data set I hope he is using postgres. sqlite will not cut it. John ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

14, 2009 11:08 AM To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Cc: Josh Fisher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Hello Mr. Fisher, > > I Apologize for misunderstandings. I am newbie for B

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Hello Mr. Fisher, > > I Apologize for misunderstandings. I am newbie for Bacula. > No need to apologize. > > Could you please let me know where can I find the location of the > catalog database which is been set for Bacula? > That

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

. Januar 2009 16:34 To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Cc: John Drescher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Thanks Mr. Drescher for the reply. > > 1. We will surely give it a try for using latest Bacula version and se

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

>> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the >> system level full backup. >> > > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored > on the same file system that is being backed up. Since Bacula must write to > its catalog database frequently dur

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

gt; From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 16:31 > To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) > Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed > > >> We are using Bacula to take the backups on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed > We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu > FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7. > That is a old version. You will get better performance with the current release. > > Pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

> We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu > FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7. > That is a old version. You will get better performance with the current release. > > Problem is we get very slow backup speed , around 50 GB per hour wherea