On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: > >> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the > >> system level full backup. > >> > > > > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored > > on the same file system that is being backed up. Since Bacula must write to > > its catalog database frequently during a backup, that would cause disk > > thrashing and greatly affect performance. > > > > Exactly. >
so, would it be considered a 'best practice' to have the catalog database server that is on a separate machine that the bacula server? -- michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
