On 04/04/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, I haven't. This is a purely RPM install. I grabbed the SRPM
> > bacula-1.38.5-4.src.rpm and rebuilt it for CentOS4 (effectively
> > RHEL4).
>
> Did one of the binary rpms install the rescue directory?
Yep. The bacula-client RPM on the c
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:37, Will McDonald wrote:
> On 04/04/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > No, I haven't. This is a purely RPM install. I grabbed the SRPM
> > > bacula-1.38.5-4.src.rpm and rebuilt it for CentOS4 (effectively
> > > RHEL4).
> >
> > Did one of the binary rpms in
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 21:51, Will McDonald wrote:
> On 04/04/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 18:30, Will McDonald wrote:
> > > Yeah, I did kinda jump in in the middle, I got side-tracked by
> > > skipping down to how to build a rescue CD for multiple host
On 04/04/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 18:30, Will McDonald wrote:
> > Yeah, I did kinda jump in in the middle, I got side-tracked by
> > skipping down to how to build a rescue CD for multiple hosts so I
> > haven't run a configure.
> >
> > But again, readin
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 18:30, Will McDonald wrote:
> Yeah, I did kinda jump in in the middle, I got side-tracked by
> skipping down to how to build a rescue CD for multiple hosts so I
> haven't run a configure.
>
> But again, reading this:
>
> "For users of the bacula-rescue rpm the static bacula
Yeah, I did kinda jump in in the middle, I got side-tracked by
skipping down to how to build a rescue CD for multiple hosts so I
haven't run a configure.
But again, reading this:
"For users of the bacula-rescue rpm the static bacula-fd has already
been built and placed in /etc/bacula/rescue/linux
On 04/04/06, Will McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04/04/06, Mikael Kermorgant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Is fixing this going to be as simple as changing STATIC_FD in
> > > 'bacula/Makefile' to somewhere that exists?
> > >
> >
> > I think you forgot to run
> >
> > make --with
Hello,
You are on the right track, but I recommend you actually read the section you
cite below, and follow it line by line.
I see no where that the first step is to do "make bacula". Somehow you have
leaped into the middle of everything without even doing the configure. Doing
"make bacula"
On 04/04/06, Mikael Kermorgant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Is fixing this going to be as simple as changing STATIC_FD in
> > 'bacula/Makefile' to somewhere that exists?
> >
>
> I think you forgot to run
>
> make --with-bacula= in the root of
> the bacula-rescue folder.
Does this mean I need
