Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

mputer...@familyhistoryact.org.au url: familyhistoryact.org.au From: Heitor Faria Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 12:16 AM To: computer...@familyhistoryact.org.au Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation Hello Howard, "On Feb 3, 2024, at 7:08 A

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

Morning Cupcake (Bill), "So, any volunteers? :)" I not only volunteer, but I would be willing to prospect and sponsor a Brazilian QT developer to work with this project, but we need to know how to start. I believe Git Lab is now the CBacula current developer platform: https://gitlab.bacula.org/bacu

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

Hello Howard, "On Feb 3, 2024, at 7:08 AM, computer...@familyhistoryact.org.au wrote: Hi,Thanks for all the responses, an interesting discussion.Bacularis would probably be a good solution for us except for the security concern. Allowing Apache access to the backup directory would mean all web apps

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

ACT email: computer...@familyhistoryact.org.au url: familyhistoryact.org.au -Original Message- From: Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2024 4:50 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation On 2/2/24 09:35, Phil Stracc

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

On 2/2/24 09:35, Phil Stracchino wrote: BAT still does everything I want a Bacula console to do. The things that it does NOT do, like configuration, I don't WANT it to; I want to do those myself, by hand, using a proper editor. Hi Phil! You sound like one of the customers of mine I mentioned

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

On 2/2/24 08:53, Heitor Faria wrote: "*Having said that, years ago, I had customers that LOVE LOVE LOVED BAT, and would not move away from it even at my urging, so there is one reason, I guess. :)" Frankly, I never understood this community's urge to regularly create "one more Bacula GUI", inst

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

Hi, Completely agree regarding Baculum and Bacularis, which are really great projects giving “almost” full controls on Bacula. Really sad to know BAT isn’t maintained anymore. Regarding last Heitor’s comment, sorry but I somehow disagree, and the reason is not because I’m maintaining Bacula-Web

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

On 2/2/24 10:25, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: All good information. And I would strongly urge to move away from BAT in favor of Bacularis (for example). Bacularis, unlike BAT allows you to configure every aspect of your Bacula environment, and as Rob mentioned, Marcin Haba, a Bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

On 2/2/24 10:53, Heitor Faria wrote: Frankly, I never understood this community's urge to regularly create "one more Bacula GUI", instead of just fixing and improve the state-of-art. IMHO bacula.org should adopt and sponsor BAT and Bacularis/Baculum GUIs development, get peop

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

"*Having said that, years ago, I had customers that LOVE LOVE LOVED BAT, and would not move away from it even at my urging, so there is one reason, I guess. :)" Frankly, I never understood this community's urge to regularly create "one more Bacula GUI", instead of just fixing and improve the state

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

On 2/2/24 05:48, Rob Gerber wrote: > As far as I know, BAT is available only with enterprise bacula. Hello Rob, (and Howard Viccars), BAT (Bacula Administration Tool) is a long-unmaintained QT graphical interface to 'manage' Bacula and is available in Community. I say 'manage' because BAT is

Re: [Bacula-users] BAT Installation

As far as I know, BAT is available only with enterprise bacula. I believe your choices with regard to bacula community are baculum, bacularis, and bacula-web. Bacularis is a friendly fork of baculum, and is the better maintained package. Developer is on this list. Bacula-web - I have not tested