Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Critical Bacula Bug

2007-09-10 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 10 September 2007 08:35, James Harper wrote: >>> >> >From Debian (the only distribution I'm really familiar with): >> >From Debian (the only distribution I'm really familiar with): >> >> Sarge (oldstable) - 1.36.2 >> Sar

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Critical Bacula Bug

2007-09-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 10 September 2007 08:35, James Harper wrote: > > I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch > > without > > > having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not > > what I > > > consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not > > "official

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Critical Bacula Bug

2007-09-09 Thread James Harper
> > I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch without > having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not what I > consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not "officially" > released but are attached to an open bug report. Understood. > Can

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Critical Bacula Bug

2007-09-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:47, James Harper wrote: > > At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless > > there > > > is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not -- > > it > > > would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would > > requir

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Critical Bacula Bug

2007-09-09 Thread James Harper
> > At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless there > is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not -- it > would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would require > rather extensive testing. The only issue I can see with this is that