Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula 2.0.0 goodness, RPM SPEC building

2007-01-09 Thread Scott Barninger
Thanks for the offer. Felix Schwarz is building EL4 64 bit packages. If you would be interested in building and contributing 32 bit please see the instructions in platforms/contrib-rpms directory. On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 13:33 -0700, Dan Trainor wrote: > Hi, Scott - > > Thanks for the update - much

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula 2.0.0 goodness, RPM SPEC building

2007-01-09 Thread Scott Barninger
I hope to publish the rpm packages this weekend. For the impatient, the most recent 1.39 SRPM should be essentially the same code, albeit packaged with 1.38 docs. Or, as Kern mentions, the spec file in the tarball should build as I have been testing and updating throughout the 1.39.x releases.

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula 2.0.0 goodness, RPM SPEC building

2007-01-09 Thread Scott Barninger
I hope to publish the rpm packages this weekend. On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:23 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Thursday 04 January 2007 19:53, Dan Trainor wrote: > > Hi, all - > > > > Now, Kern, I noticed that you're noted as the RPM package maintainer for > > the 1.38 series - should the same be

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula 2.0.0 goodness, RPM SPEC building

2007-01-05 Thread Dan Trainor
Hi, Scott - Thanks for the update - much appreciated. If you would like additional testing, please do let me know. I'd be happy to spend a short while over the weekend. Most of my testing will be done under RHEL4/CentOS4. Thanks -dant Scott Barninger wrote: > I hope to publish the rpm packa