Thanks for the offer. Felix Schwarz is building EL4 64 bit packages. If
you would be interested in building and contributing 32 bit please see
the instructions in platforms/contrib-rpms directory.

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 13:33 -0700, Dan Trainor wrote:
> Hi, Scott -
> 
> Thanks for the update - much appreciated.
> 
> If you would like additional testing, please do let me know.  I'd be 
> happy to spend a short while over the weekend.  Most of my testing will 
> be done under RHEL4/CentOS4.
> 
> Thanks
> -dant
> 
> Scott Barninger wrote:
> > I hope to publish the rpm packages this weekend. For the impatient, the 
> > most recent 1.39 SRPM should be essentially the same code, albeit packaged 
> > with 1.38 docs. Or, as Kern mentions, the spec file in the tarball should 
> > build as I have been testing and updating throughout the 1.39.x releases.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:23 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> On Thursday 04 January 2007 19:53, Dan Trainor wrote:
> >>> Hi, all -
> >>>
> >>> Now, Kern, I noticed that you're noted as the RPM package maintainer for 
> >>> the 1.38 series - should the same be assumed about the 2.0 series, as 
> >>> well?
> >> Well, I may be "listed" as the maintainer, but Scott Barninger is the guy 
> >> who 
> >> does the work.
> >>
> >>> I guess what I'm getting at is, I'm sure there are a few people who are 
> >>> plenty eager to find a nice SRPM for the 2.0 series, because we use RPMs 
> >>> a lot more frequently than we use tarballs and such.  Are there any 
> >>> plans to package and distribute a SRPM or spec file within the next few 
> >>> days?
> >> I covered that in my release announcement -- it is up to the packager not 
> >> me.
> >>
> >>> Is any help needed for creating a 2.0 SPEC file for building RPMs with? 
> >>>   If work has not already started, I can surely hack one up and give it 
> >>> to you guys - however, I'm not so sure if it would be up to Kern's 
> >>> expectations :)
> >> I believe that the .spec file that is in the source code is perfectly fine 
> >> with the exception of updating the version numbers of everything, ...
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> >> your
> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bacula-devel mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
> >>
> > 
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to