On 4/1/2011 2:56 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> Randy Katz wrote:
>
>> I have a Full being created every month with a 3 Volume Retention and
>> a Time of 60d then there should never be a time when
>> there is no Full before Diff/Incr's, right?
>
> Correct, but with monthly fulls you should set the time
Randy Katz wrote:
> I have a Full being created every month with a 3 Volume Retention and a
> Time of 60d then there should never be a time when
> there is no Full before Diff/Incr's, right?
Correct, but with monthly fulls you should set the time to 90-100 days.
> If I wanted a 180 day cycle
On 3/31/2011 10:20 AM, Randy Katz wrote:
> On 3/31/2011 10:02 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
>> Randy Katz wrote:
>>
>>> Alan, thank you for that answer and please excuse my questions:
>>>
>>> 1. Do you have a different expire time (60d) for your Full then your
>>> Incrementals or does it matter?
>> I set t
On 3/31/2011 10:02 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> Randy Katz wrote:
>
>> Alan, thank you for that answer and please excuse my questions:
>>
>> 1. Do you have a different expire time (60d) for your Full then your
>> Incrementals or does it matter?
>
> I set the database file/job expire time to 100 years a
Randy Katz wrote:
> Alan, thank you for that answer and please excuse my questions:
>
> 1. Do you have a different expire time (60d) for your Full then your
> Incrementals or does it matter?
I set the database file/job expire time to 100 years and simply roll the
media, but we do full/diff/inc
On 3/31/2011 4:43 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> Randy Katz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that I have used Bacula a full cycle (60 days) I have a question:
>>
>> If backups are done Full (which expires after 60 days).
>> Then Diff each week and Incre each day where there is no Diff
>> Then restoring from any gi
Randy Katz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that I have used Bacula a full cycle (60 days) I have a question:
>
> If backups are done Full (which expires after 60 days).
> Then Diff each week and Incre each day where there is no Diff
> Then restoring from any given date going back 60 days is not a problem
>
On 12/1/2010 11:52 AM, dietervh wrote:
> How do I define that there should be a differential the third and last
> saterday?
>
> This is what I have now, but it should be the thirth and fifth saterday :
> Level=Differential 2nd-5th sat at 0:05
>
> Is this a good idea :
>
>
> Run = Level=Full 1
.
Thanks.
-jwulf
--
Message: 20
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:04:50 -0400
From: John Lockard
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling question
To: jw...@asetech.com
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20090731190450.gk13...@umich.edu>
Content-Type
I'm fairly certain that when you do a "status dir", no matter
how many days you specify, you'll only see the soonest occuring
job of a certain level.
So, if you have a Full, Differential and an Incremental, of a
certain job defined then only the next of each of those will
be shown. If you change
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Use the directives "Max Start Delay", "Max Run Time" and "Max Wait Time"
> to set up timeouts corresponding to your needs. They are described in
> the "Configuring the Director" chapter in TFM.
Thanks Arno, I think the "Max Start Delay" will help me with this
problem :-)
R
Hello,
On 4/20/2006 5:10 PM, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Hi people,
I tried to find some reference in the mailing list but I didn't have any
success, so here I am asking.
I have daily incremental backup jobs from tuesday to friday, and a full
backup job on monday. If for some reason the job that s
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
> Novosielski
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 09:09
> To: Martin Simmons
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Schedu
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Novosielski
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 09:09
To: Martin Simmons
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling question
I learned that things like this were a problem when I starte
TECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Simmons
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 08:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling question
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:42:09 +0100, Arno Lehmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hell
I learned that things like this were a problem when I started using
bacula, as there is no easy way to schedule it. As it was, with Data
Protector, I had been doing it by hand anyway. Doing the 1st and 3rd
Tuesday is how I ultimately handled the situation. We don't have off
hours staff anyway,
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:42:09 +0100, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 2/23/2006 8:11 PM, Jeremy Koppel wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > Weve been using Bacula in our company since the beginning
> > of the year with a good deal of success,
Hello,
On 2/23/2006 8:11 PM, Jeremy Koppel wrote:
Hello,
We’ve been using Bacula in our company since the beginning
of the year with a good deal of success, but I had a scheduling question
that I hadn’t anticipated earlier. As part of our backup rotation, I
have 2 additiona
18 matches
Mail list logo
