>On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:06:39 -0400, you wrote:
>George R.Kasica wrote:
>> Got all the labeling and cleaning tape definitions done here over the
>> weekend and built a series of jobs to backup not only my local Linux
>> Server but a W2K3 Server as well as a WinXP Pro system as well.
>>
>> Key to
20%.
Maybe it can help...
Ciao
Fabio
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] em nome de Phil Stracchino
Enviada: sex 12/08/2005 18.10
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Assunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Horribly slow through put on backup test to disk
George R. Kasica wrote:
>>On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:06:39 -0400, you wrote:
> In a related matter, I backed up a remote W2K3 Server Tuesday and got
> about the same speed. BUT, I've started a backup on the XPPro notebook
> box (with the firewall holes to allow it) and I'm seeing about 115K
> onlyl
George R.Kasica wrote:
> Got all the labeling and cleaning tape definitions done here over the
> weekend and built a series of jobs to backup not only my local Linux
> Server but a W2K3 Server as well as a WinXP Pro system as well.
>
> Key to the XP Pro was allowing Ports 9101, 9102 and 9104 TCP
>On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 06:17:24 -0500, you wrote:
>Phil:
>
>Totally new questionI'm at the point of doing the various tape
>labels to build my pools here but was wondering how I do the
>following:
>
>Each cartridge has 1 cleaning tape in it and I want to let bacula know
>either:
>
>1) Ideally th
George R. Kasica wrote:
> Phil:
>
> Totally new questionI'm at the point of doing the various tape
> labels to build my pools here but was wondering how I do the
> following:
>
> Each cartridge has 1 cleaning tape in it and I want to let bacula know
> either:
>
> 1) Ideally this is a cleanin
George R. Kasica wrote:
> Phil:
>
> Totally new questionI'm at the point of doing the various tape
> labels to build my pools here but was wondering how I do the
> following:
>
> Each cartridge has 1 cleaning tape in it and I want to let bacula know
> either:
>
> 1) Ideally this is a cleanin
George R. Kasica wrote:
>>George R. Kasica wrote:
>>Hmmm...OK, I'll pass this on to the list and see what I get. I have
>>seen something on the web about needing to do an mt -f /dev/nst0
>>offline before trying an unload, but since the device is erroring out
>>to mt I'll have to work on that more w
Hi,
George R.Kasica wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:56:21 +0200, you wrote:
...
What is the process to upgrade to 1.37.30...is it as easy as untar and
make?
Not quite.
If you are on 1.36.3 already, it is:
- untar
- configure
- make
- save old Bacula
- save old database
- make install
- upgra
>On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:56:21 +0200, you wrote:
>On Tuesday 26 July 2005 22:11, George R. Kasica wrote:
>> >On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:48:08 +0200, you wrote:
>> >
>> >You don't by any chance have a lot of hard links on your system do you?
>> > Or run or have run BackupPC?
>>
>> If you're referring t
>On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:48:08 +0200, you wrote:
>You don't by any chance have a lot of hard links on your system do you? Or
>run or have run BackupPC?
If you're referring to symlinks, no, none at all in the directory That
it backs up in the test script, I believe its called bacula-1.36.3 off
the
George R. Kasica wrote:
> OK, I can do that.with one set of questions on the Save steps and
> the Upgrade stephow do I go about those, I'm guessing upgrade
> database is the binary on the /bacula/bin directory but what am I
> copying to save it all in terms of database and Bacula??
Bacula'
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 22:11, George R. Kasica wrote:
> >On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:48:08 +0200, you wrote:
> >
> >You don't by any chance have a lot of hard links on your system do you?
> > Or run or have run BackupPC?
>
> If you're referring to symlinks, no, none at all in the directory That
> it b
You don't by any chance have a lot of hard links on your system do you? Or
run or have run BackupPC?
If so, try using 1.37.30 and set "Hardlinks = no" in your Options and see if
that improves performance. If so, let me know. Otherwise, perhaps Phil can
find something.
...
On Sunday 24 July
L PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
->Of George R.Kasica
->Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:41 PM
->To: Phil Stracchino
->Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
->Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Horribly slow through put on
->backup test to disk
->
->>On M
>On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:48:09 -0400, you wrote:
>Well, it doesn't look as though anything there would not be expected to
>be up to the task there must be something going on that's not
>immediately apparent, but without poking around the system by hand, I
>don't have any particular ideas of w
t: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:48 PM
->To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
->Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Horribly slow through put on
->backup test to disk
->
->Well, it doesn't look as though anything there would not be
->expected to be up to the task there mu
Well, it doesn't look as though anything there would not be expected to
be up to the task there must be something going on that's not
immediately apparent, but without poking around the system by hand, I
don't have any particular ideas of what might be at fault.
--
Phil Stracchino [
See answers below, sorry for lack of original details.
George
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:56:22 -0400, you wrote:
>Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is definitely something wrong with your system. I get *minimum*
>> numbers
>> such as 1200 KB/s for writing to disk.
>>
>> I suspect you
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is definitely something wrong with your system. I get *minimum*
> numbers
> such as 1200 KB/s for writing to disk.
>
> I suspect you are not getting any answers because you haven't given any
> information:
> - What kind of OS is the Dir running on?
> -
20 matches
Mail list logo
