On Friday 28 April 2006 15:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
...
>
> What is the debugger situation with this cross-compiling technology? Can
> VC++ still be used for source level debugging and breakpoints with the
> cross-compiled binary?
>
> __Martin
By the way, in downloading the latest wxWidgets code
On 29 Apr 2006 at 9:13, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> The Source Forge public CVS is broken. Please find the recent email from Dan
> Langille, who is providing a daily tar file of the developer's CVS. Although
> I welcome users trying this, for the moment I cannot provide much help
> because we are j
>
> The Source Forge public CVS is broken. Please find the recent email
from
> Dan
> Langille, who is providing a daily tar file of the developer's CVS.
Found it thanks.
> Although
> I welcome users trying this, for the moment I cannot provide much help
> because we are just at the point of get
On Saturday 29 April 2006 07:19, James Harper wrote:
> > However, you should know that we are within hours of dropping support
>
> for
>
> > Microsoft compilers. I suspect by next Monday all Win32 builds will
>
> be
>
> > done
> > using GNU C cross-compile tools on Linux, with the exception of
>
>
On Saturday 29 April 2006 04:53, James Harper wrote:
> > However, you should know that we are within hours of dropping support
>
> for
>
> > Microsoft compilers. I suspect by next Monday all Win32 builds will
>
> be
>
> > done
> > using GNU C cross-compile tools on Linux, with the exception of
>
>
> However, you should know that we are within hours of dropping support
for
> Microsoft compilers. I suspect by next Monday all Win32 builds will
be
> done
> using GNU C cross-compile tools on Linux, with the exception of
building
> the
> installer file, which will probably be done on Win32.
I've
>
> However, you should know that we are within hours of dropping support
for
> Microsoft compilers. I suspect by next Monday all Win32 builds will
be
> done
> using GNU C cross-compile tools on Linux, with the exception of
building
> the
> installer file, which will probably be done on Win32.
T
On Friday 28 April 2006 15:27, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:56:22 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
> >
> > On Friday 28 April 2006 13:20, James Harper wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> > > > > Are there instructions fo
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:56:22 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On Friday 28 April 2006 13:20, James Harper wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> > > > Are there instructions for building the windows version from source?
> > >
> > > /src/win32/REA
On Friday 28 April 2006 13:20, James Harper wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> > > Are there instructions for building the windows version from source?
> >
> > /src/win32/README.win32
>
> Thanks
>
> > We don't provide support on this because it is simply too complicat
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> > Are there instructions for building the windows version from source?
> >
> /src/win32/README.win32
Thanks
> We don't provide support on this because it is simply too complicated.
I
> will
> answer simple, well defined questions though. I
sourceforge.net
Cc: James Harper
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Building windows version from source
On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> Are there instructions for building the windows version from source?
>
/src/win32/README.win32
We don't provide support on this beca
On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:48, James Harper wrote:
> Are there instructions for building the windows version from source?
>
/src/win32/README.win32
We don't provide support on this because it is simply too complicated. I will
answer simple, well defined questions though. If you don't strictly
13 matches
Mail list logo
