Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 11 March 2006 12:02, Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > > >> > > >> I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of > > >> three > > >> > > > >> tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't > > > >> know why

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-11 Thread Ralf Gross
> > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > >> I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of three > > >> tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't > > >> know why > > >> volbytes/files show these values. > > >> > > >> Looking at the volume st

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 10 March 2006 20:03, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 3/10/2006 4:03 PM, Erich Prinz wrote: > > I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in > > restoring the files, it never poses any problems. > > > > The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control freak

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-10 Thread Ralf Gross
Erich Prinz schrieb: > I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in > restoring the files, it never poses any problems. I haven't tried to restore files from this volume, but I expect this wouldn't be a problem. > The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control fre

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-10 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 3/10/2006 4:03 PM, Erich Prinz wrote: I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in restoring the files, it never poses any problems. The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control freak types, this is a bit awkward) per the Bacula documentation it's b

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-10 Thread Erich Prinz
I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in restoring the files, it never poses any problems. The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control freak types, this is a bit awkward) per the Bacula documentation it's best to let Bacula decide what volumes to use. Ju

[Bacula-users] wrong date in firstwritten field (1970-01-01 01:00:00)

2006-03-10 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I use a pool with 6 tapes for weekly full backup, each full backup needs 3 tapes. Retention worked fine for the last few weeks, the expected volumes were used (volume retention 9 days, week 1 volume Bang1/2/3, week 2 volume Bang3/4/5...). Today I got the notification about the upcoming jobs th