Dimitri Puzin schrieb:
>>> IMHO is the configuration not as much distributed as LDAP was designed
>>> for/to pull real benefit from it. The most important configuration is
>>> the one from bacula-dir and there is usually only one instance of it
>>> running on the network. Another moreless single t
On Thursday 22 March 2007 13:31, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
...
>
> > By the way, bacula is a really neat piece of software -- despite of not
> > yet beeing complete -- and I've had been glad if bacula at this stage
> > existed seven years ago.
> Yeah, long time ago I've switched from commercial product
Hans Manz schrieb:
> Dimitri Puzin schrieb:
>
>>> Of course you could do all that with SQL, but LDAP is
>>> optimized for just this purpose. I could elaborate this point, if you wish.
>> Please.
>
> If you don't mind I would postpone this. *ehem* :-) Basically it boils
> down to simplicity and pe
Dimitri Puzin schrieb:
>> Of course you could do all that with SQL, but LDAP is
>> optimized for just this purpose. I could elaborate this point, if you wish.
> Please.
If you don't mind I would postpone this. *ehem* :-) Basically it boils
down to simplicity and performance for specific purposes
Alan Brown schrieb:
>
> I am just starting down the LDAP path for our network and already I can
> see how it can supplant and tie together at least 6 disparate databases
> we use into a unified whole, while simultaneously being more flexible
> and providing more useable functionality.
>
> It has
Hans Manz schrieb:
> Hello!
Hi,
> You replied to me only, I assume by accident. Therefore I quote your
> mail to the list. This is ok, hopefully.
Oops, that wasn't my intention. Thanks.
> Dimitri Puzin schrieb:
>
>>> If not already requested anywhere, LDAP support would be a sexy feature
>>> (co
I am just starting down the LDAP path for our network and already I can
see how it can supplant and tie together at least 6 disparate databases
we use into a unified whole, while simultaneously being more flexible and
providing more useable functionality.
It has the potential to be extremely po
Hello!
You replied to me only, I assume by accident. Therefore I quote your
mail to the list. This is ok, hopefully.
Dimitri Puzin schrieb:
>> If not already requested anywhere, LDAP support would be a sexy feature
>> (configuration, job definitions, etc.).
> Hmm, to me, it would seem more meani
HM schrieb:
>
> If not already requested anywhere, LDAP support would be a sexy feature
> (configuration, job definitions, etc.).
http://www.bacula.org/?page=feature-request
Ralf
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Fut
HM schrieb:
> Hello!
>
> If not already requested anywhere, LDAP support would be a sexy feature
> (configuration, job definitions, etc.).
>
> /hm
>
I reply to myself just to clarify what I mean. A google search on
"site:bacula.org ldap" did not give me anything, so maybe this idea was
not disu
Hello!
If not already requested anywhere, LDAP support would be a sexy feature
(configuration, job definitions, etc.).
/hm
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
