Frank Sweetser wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Masopust, Christian wrote:
>> Hello Frank,
>>
>> thanks a lot for this info! but :-)))
>>
>> could anybody give the complete info (maybe also modify the wiki-page) how
>> these indexes should be created?
>
> The best place to
On 2006-09-19 09:44, Masopust, Christian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe you also read the answer i got about changing the indexes in the
> File - table. i followed this suggestion and dbcheck now runs many times
> faster than before!!
>
> http://paramount.ind.wpi.edu/wiki/doku.php?id=faq#why_does_dbch
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Masopust, Christian wrote:
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> thanks a lot for this info! but :-)))
>
> could anybody give the complete info (maybe also modify the wiki-page) how
> these indexes should be created?
The best place to find that is in the document
st, Christian
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] dbcheck needs very long time...
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:30:39AM +0200, Masopust, Christian wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > is it really ok that dbcheck (check 10: eliminate orp
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:30:39AM +0200, Masopust, Christian wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> is it really ok that dbcheck (check 10: eliminate orphaned Filename records)
> run more then 24 hours? I started it yesterday in the morning and it is still
> running
On larger catalogs, yes, that is not inc
Hello,
is it really ok that dbcheck (check 10: eliminate orphaned Filename records)
run more then 24 hours? I started it yesterday in the morning and it is still
running
Christian
___
Christian Masopust
