John Drescher wrote:
>> If I remove the tape, and do a "update slots scan" or "update slots" in
>> bconsole, the media is still flagged "inchanger 1". this is an issue
>> aswell, but I can live with that, since tapes are back in the library
>> prior to the Volume Retention.
>>
> Are you using bacul
> If I remove the tape, and do a "update slots scan" or "update slots" in
> bconsole, the media is still flagged "inchanger 1". this is an issue
> aswell, but I can live with that, since tapes are back in the library
> prior to the Volume Retention.
>
Are you using bacula 2.4.X and not some ancient
John Drescher wrote:
>> this is what I use, but on the next bacula run, bacula kept wanting to
>> load the tape prior to take into consideration that the tape was past
>> the expiration time of usage.
>>
>> The big issue is the fact that the tape is no longer in the library
>> since it is gone for
> this is what I use, but on the next bacula run, bacula kept wanting to
> load the tape prior to take into consideration that the tape was past
> the expiration time of usage.
>
> The big issue is the fact that the tape is no longer in the library
> since it is gone for safe keeping. So bacula fin
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
>>> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>>>
>>> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
>>> reuse the tape instead of taking a new
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Pascal Clermont
> wrote:
>> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
>> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>>
>> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
>> reuse the tape instead of taking a new o
> I Have several jobs executed during the night (~20) and with my
> comprehension of this value, every job during the same night would be
> spawned to different tapes. "This is most useful when the Media is a file
> and you want a new file for each backup that is done." -bacula documentation
>
The
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
>> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>>
>> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
>> reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
>>
>
> Easiest way (before knowing what yo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
>> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>>
>> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
>> reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
>>
>
> E
> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>
> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
> reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
>
Easiest way (before knowing what you mean with "last job") might b
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Pascal Clermont
wrote:
> Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
> (backupcatalog in my case)?
>
> currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
> reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
>
Look for
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a "APPEND" status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Pascal
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
