On Saturday 13 January 2007 11:32, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Felix Schwarz schrieb:
> > I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforge does not play
nice with
> > crashing UTMS routers and aborted connections. Therefore, some packages
were corrupted so
> > I had to withdraw them:
> >
Felix Schwarz schrieb:
> I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforge does not play
> nice with
> crashing UTMS routers and aborted connections. Therefore, some packages were
> corrupted so
> I had to withdraw them:
> - bacula-client-2.0.0-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
> - bacula-postgresql-2
Mike Seda schrieb:
> I wish to install bacula 2.0.0 on my el4 system. I just have a
> question... What is the difference between the "rpms" and
> "rpms-contrib-fschwarz" links at
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 ? Is there a
> reason why these links are separated?
Hi All,
I wish to install bacula 2.0.0 on my el4 system. I just have a
question... What is the difference between the "rpms" and
"rpms-contrib-fschwarz" links at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 ? Is there a
reason why these links are separated? Basically, which is th
Hello,
The source rpm package has been released as well as the binary packages
which I currently support (see below). I expect that Felix and Patti
will be releasing their platform packages sometime this weekend as well.
If anyone is interested in publishing for platforms not mentioned at the
bott
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> That and the fact that their upload process is *extremely* insecure -- it is
> trivial to modify anyone's code, and it would be super trivial to substitute
> a root kit or any other attack without the knowledge of the person releasing
> the files. I informed Source Forge
Alan Brown schrieb:
> One of the other posters has commented on the updatedb problem if a mysql
> root/bacula password is set.
>
> As locking down mysql access is essential for security, I think it would
> be best if the script asked for login/pass before touching mysql
This is one of the p
It would be nice if the rpm upgraded all the databases.
I have 2 catalogs/databases and only one was automatically upgraded.
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
>
>> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The
>> updatedb RPM is a noarch pack
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The
> updatedb RPM is a noarch package (which is only not labeled as such due
> to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb
> packages released by Scott.
One of t
Many thanks Felix :-)
On Monday 08 January 2007 23:01, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
> noarch package (which is only not labeled
> as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the
updatedb pack
Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb
RPM is a
noarch package (which is only not labeled
as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb
packages
released by Scott.
I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforg
11 matches
Mail list logo
