Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-16 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:44:25 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Thursday 16 September 2010 15:25:07 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-16 Thread Silver Salonen
On Thursday 16 September 2010 15:25:07 Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 Se

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-16 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > > > On 14.09.2010 18:48,

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-15 Thread Silver Salonen
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silve

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:08:17 +0200, Bruno Friedmann said: > > Martin didn't A status for Accurate ( as shown in the extract log ) ? No, there is no special status for Accurate. __Martin -- Start uncovering the man

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > >> > > >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Mart

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-15 Thread Silver Salonen
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 08:53:07 Silver Salonen wrote: > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > >> > > >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin S

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > >> > >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salo

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: >> >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said: On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Ma

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On 14.09.2010 21:08, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On 09/14/2010 05:48 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: >>> Yes, with job status "A". >> >> Status "A" is a failure code for "Cancelled". Is that what you expected? >> Bacula will ignore that job w

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 09/14/2010 05:48 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: >> >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said: On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote: > > > > Am 14.09.2010 09:53, s

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote: > > > Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen: > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christi

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote: > > Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen: > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote: > > >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen: >

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote: > Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote: > >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen: > >>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote: > Am

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Christian Manal
Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen: > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote: >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen: >>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote: Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen: > Hello. > > I u

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote: > Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote: > >> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen: > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge ar

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Christian Manal
Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen: > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote: >> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup that >>> has no full backup in its schedule: >>> >>> S

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote: > Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen: > > Hello. > > > > I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup that > > has no full backup in its schedule: > > > > Schedule { > > Name = Archive > >

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 Thread Christian Manal
Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen: > Hello. > > I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup that has > no full backup in its schedule: > > Schedule { > Name = Archive > Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05 > Run = Level=Incremental

[Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-13 Thread Silver Salonen
Hello. I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup that has no full backup in its schedule: Schedule { Name = Archive Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05 Run = Level=Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05 Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at