> Elapsed time: 2 mins 35 secs
> Priority: 10
> FD Files Written: 4,648
> SD Files Written: 4,648
> FD Bytes Written: 664,739,011 (664.7 MB)
> SD Bytes Written: 665,458,318 (665.4 MB)
> Rate: 4288.6 KB/s
> Software Co
On 1/25/2010 2:46 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
"Mike Ruskai" kirjoitti viestissä
news:4b5dcf2f.9050...@earthlink.net...
On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
50%.
In Windows, 100% load means all CPU
"mehma sarja" kirjoitti viestissä
news:ec5d34681001250830h9cfb180naea17beb1a544...@mail.gmail.com...
> Timo,.
>
>Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or
>varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of
>small email index files is harder on
"Mike Ruskai" kirjoitti viestissä
news:4b5dcf2f.9050...@earthlink.net...
> On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>> some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
>> 50%.
>>
>>
> In Windows, 100% load means all CPU's together at max load. If you have
> two cores,
On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
> 50%.
>
>
In Windows, 100% load means all CPU's together at max load. If you have
two cores, 50% means 100% load on one core.
So you're seeing the best that CPU can do (and
Timo,.
Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or
varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of
small email index files is harder on Bacula than thousands of large files.
And you don't mentioned if or how you controlled for your network band
"Bacula sucks the vital essence from your computer" says the slogan... and
somehow it now looks true to me (though not the way it was meant to)
After years of some experience with Linux&Bacula combination, I finally
started making some experiments with Windows client. After a few very (not
so n
