"mehma sarja" <mehmasa...@gmail.com> kirjoitti viestissä news:ec5d34681001250830h9cfb180naea17beb1a544...@mail.gmail.com... > Timo,. > >Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or >varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of >small email index files is harder on Bacula than thousands of large files. >And you don't mentioned if or how you controlled for your network >bandwidth - did you keep all traffic off it? > > I'd suggest you use a data set which is typical of your intended use and > multiply it by a factor of 10 and keep bandwidth stable.
Network load definetely wasn't the reason here, hard to document it, but I just know it. Also, the results were very repeatable when I run the same test several times, this doesn't sound like a network load problem either. But yes, I'll need to re-run the test with another type of data. A lot of small files will cause plenty of overhead. I just didn't think it would be that much overhead... -- Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
