> > individual volumes / file system mount points to Bacula, you *can't*
> > tell Bacula to put each "file tape" on a different mount point and/or
> > sub-directory.
>
> This *can* be accomplished by using symbolic linking. In an application that
Ahh good point.
Moreover, with RAID5, unless yo
On Monday 20 March 2006 21:18, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> RAID5 is best with a hot spare volume, otherwise...what's the advantage
> that justifies increased write overhead?
>
> Besides, does the file system you're backing up to require any more
> redundancy from a disk technology standpoint than yo
RAID5 is best with a hot spare volume, otherwise...what's the advantage
that justifies increased write overhead?
Besides, does the file system you're backing up to require any more
redundancy from a disk technology standpoint than you might expect out
of the life expectancy of a single DLT tape?
Arno,
Thanks for the reply.
cvs: bacula/bacula/scripts/disk-changer.in
Is this what I should be looking at?
I'll be setting up a 4-disk hot swappable external SATA enclosure with 1+ Tb
of storage to backup all our graphics files.
I'm not sure if I should set it up RAID 5 and treat it as one
