Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote:
>You need to fix the underlying problem.
>The first step to do so is to run the btape tests and tweak the configuration
>until they all run without >failure.
>I have seen occasional errors - I have decided to replace my SCSI ca
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote:
> > Hi List
> >
> > I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be
> > caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the
> > tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a n
Hi,
28.02.2008 12:49, Damian Brasher wrote:
> Hi List
>
> I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be
> caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the
> tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a number of ways.
>
> The first is
Hi List
I have had some fairly regular job failures that I have pinpointed to be
caused by tape status type error mismatches. The most common is that the
tape status does not match that of the catalogue in a number of ways.
The first is that if the catalogue reports the volume status to be
err
