Which version of bacula-fd?
Tirsdag 02 januar 2007 12:35 skrev Alan Brown:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> > So I downloaded the latest KNOPPIX, which includes a bacula-fd.
>
> It would appear that my previous mail has already been addressed..
>
> :-)
>
> ---
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> My position is still that staying out of the bootup process is best.
> Let KNOPPIX, or MORPHIX or whateverix get me to a bash prompt and then
> I'll handle getting bacula-fd running. KNOPPIX will boot the majority
> of boxes out there, so I'll beg
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> So I downloaded the latest KNOPPIX, which includes a bacula-fd.
It would appear that my previous mail has already been addressed..
:-)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influe
On Saturday 30 December 2006 01:04, Mikael Kermorgant wrote:
> > Well, after a comment someone made on this thread and thinking about it a
lot
> > lately, I don't think it is necessary at all to integrate the Bacula
> > directory with any LiveCD.
>
> Hello,
>
> Having spent some hours integratin
> Well, after a comment someone made on this thread and thinking about it a lot
> lately, I don't think it is necessary at all to integrate the Bacula
> directory with any LiveCD.
Hello,
Having spent some hours integrating rescue scripts into a Knoppix cd,
I totally agree with this. The most impo
On Friday 29 December 2006 18:22, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:13:41PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Yes, but unfortunately, it is a 1.36.x FD if I remember right, which
> > *may* be OK with a current Bacula Director/SD (maybe not), but
> > probably will not do very w
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:13:41PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, but unfortunately, it is a 1.36.x FD if I remember right, which
> *may* be OK with a current Bacula Director/SD (maybe not), but
> probably will not do very well with the likes of ACLs and all the
> new stuff that has been added
On Friday 29 December 2006 16:45, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> I just found Scott / Kern's little thread re: bare metal restore; here
> is my report from having battled with it for ~2 weeks:
>
> The first problem I encountered is that the initrd is an ext2 fs,
> which is no longer built into most
I just found Scott / Kern's little thread re: bare metal restore; here
is my report from having battled with it for ~2 weeks:
The first problem I encountered is that the initrd is an ext2 fs,
which is no longer built into most distros' kernels. Apparently
everybody's using initramfs. I rebuilt m
On Thursday 14 December 2006 2:42 pm, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:41, Scott Simpson wrote:
> > What is the state of the bare metal restore code (from CD or DVD) on
> > Linux?
>
> I
>
> > recall Kern saying something that the code needed to be redone. I'm
> > thinking of ap
On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:41, Scott Simpson wrote:
> What is the state of the bare metal restore code (from CD or DVD) on Linux?
I
> recall Kern saying something that the code needed to be redone. I'm thinking
> of approaching that as my next Bacula task. Thank you.
I've integrated the ol
What is the state of the bare metal restore code (from CD or DVD) on Linux? I
recall Kern saying something that the code needed to be redone. I'm thinking
of approaching that as my next Bacula task. Thank you.
-
Take Surveys
12 matches
Mail list logo
