Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line: solved!

2011-01-10 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > > > I did some tests with different gzip levels and with no compression > > at all. It makes a difference but not as expected. Without > > compression I still have a rate of only 11346.1 KB/s. Anything else > > I should try? > > Are you sure the cro

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-10 Thread Gavin McCullagh
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > I did some tests with different gzip levels and with no compression at > all. It makes a difference but not as expected. Without compression I > still have a rate of only 11346.1 KB/s. Anything else I should try? Are you sure the cross-over connecti

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/9/2011 6:19 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >>> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. >>> >>> For testing purpose

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
>> Hi all, >> >> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. >> >> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on >> bo

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-09 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
I did some tests with different gzip levels and with no compression at all. It makes a difference but not as expected. Without compression I still have a rate of only 11346.1 KB/s. Anything else I should try? Cheers, Oliver > On Saturday 08 January 2011 11:46:11 Mister IT Guru wrote: > >> On

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/8/2011 4:46 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote: > On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: >> On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (o...@dom.de) wrote: >>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/7/2011 9:48 AM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. > bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of > 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. > > For testing purpose I connected one

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 Thread Silver Salonen
On Saturday 08 January 2011 11:46:11 Mister IT Guru wrote: > On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > > On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (o...@dom.de) wrote: > >> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. > >> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max.

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 Thread Mister IT Guru
On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (o...@dom.de) wrote: >> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit conne

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-07 Thread Silver Salonen
On Friday 07 January 2011 16:48:07 Oliver Hoffmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. > bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of > 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. > > For testing purpose

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-07 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (o...@dom.de) wrote: > I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. > bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of > 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. > > For testing purpose I connected one clien

[Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-07 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
Hi all, I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on both sides) to the server