I did some tests with different gzip levels and with no compression at all. It makes a difference but not as expected. Without compression I still have a rate of only 11346.1 KB/s. Anything else I should try?
Cheers, Oliver > On Saturday 08 January 2011 11:46:11 Mister IT Guru wrote: > >> On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: >> >>> On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (o...@dom.de) wrote: >>> >>>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so. >>>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of >>>> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection. >>>> >>>> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on >>>> both sides) to the server. But I still have the same transfer rate. Why >>>> is that? >>>> >>> What sort of backups are you doing? Are you writing to tape? Are you >>> using spooling? >>> >>> >> I am new(ish) to bacula, how does spooling speed up jobs, I have noticed >> similar issues, but because the same behavior appeared on three >> instances I've built recently. I'm very interested to learn how to >> improve performance. >> > > Um.. compression? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
