Hello Phil,
I have not yet figured out what is going wrong here, or what triggered
Bacula to think it is trying to use a Volume directly from the Scratch
pool. I am going to look at the code in more detail to see if I can
find the problem. In any case, I am planning to remove the code as in
On 01/15/17 16:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> It is a bit late here so I will look at all your output tomorrow, but if
> you have the patience, go to:
>
> /src/dird/ua_run.c
> then at line 1074, you should have the following lines of code:
>
> /* Not a good idea to start a job wi
Hello Phil,
It is a bit late here so I will look at all your output tomorrow, but if
you have the patience, go to:
/src/dird/ua_run.c
then at line 1074, you should have the following lines of code:
/* Not a good idea to start a job with the Scratch pool */
if (rc.pool && strcmp(rc.pool-
Removed Storage from the Scratch pool definition.
Updated the Scratch pool from resource.
Re-updated director from 7.4.3 to 7.4.4
Re-entered the restore job. Job failed with the same
invalid-scratch-pool message.
cwd is: /
$ cd /home/alaric
cwd is: /home/alaric/
$ cd ".moonchild productions"
cw
On 01/15/17 02:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Sorry, I did not explain the problem clearly enough. For some reason (I
> hope to find out Monday), doing backups directly to a Scratch pool (i.e.
> the Scratch pool is directly referenced in the Job) do or can lead to
> problems.
Yeah, I can see that b
Hello Phil,
Please see below ...
On 01/15/2017 03:25 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>>
>>
>> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula
On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>
>
> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
> possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
> be
Hello Phil,
Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
be quite unexpected and annoying.
One solution would be t
On 01/14/17 13:49, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
>> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
>> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes
On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes into?
Oh, and it's also perfectly happy to de
I have a problem. I need to restore a single directory of files. I
have the required tape volume mounted, I set up the job, no problem,
until I exit file selection.
Then suddenly, bacula (7.4.4) tells me:
1,179 files selected to be restored.
Pool "Scratch" not valid.
Job not run.
*
...Wait,
11 matches
Mail list logo
