On 30 March 2010 10:19, Hugh Brown wrote:
> Mark Nienberg wrote:
>
[...]
>
>
> * http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=126910218517057&w=2
>
> - May be a problem with a patch applied for OpenSSL v1; small patch
> included to get around the problem for CentOS and OpenSSL 0.9.8
>
hmm the way i rea
On 3/29/2010 4:19 PM, Hugh Brown wrote:
>
> This looks (to me, anyway) a lot like the problems reported earlier
> with OpenSSL:
>
> * http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=126889471504505&w=2
Oh, I hadn't seen that one. Yes it is the same problem and the fix proposed in
that
message worked for me
Mark Nienberg wrote:
> I haven't been able to get the src rpm for 5.0.1-2 to build on Centos 5.4. I
> have
> successfully built many prior versions of bacula on this machine, so I'm not
> sure
> what is wrong. I've read the previous posts and the wiki article about this
> but none
> of them se
I haven't been able to get the src rpm for 5.0.1-2 to build on Centos 5.4. I
have
successfully built many prior versions of bacula on this machine, so I'm not
sure
what is wrong. I've read the previous posts and the wiki article about this
but none
of them seems like the problem I have.
I'
