On 30 March 2010 10:19, Hugh Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Nienberg wrote:
>
[...]
>
>
> * http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=126910218517057&w=2
>
> - May be a problem with a patch applied for OpenSSL v1; small patch
> included to get around the problem for CentOS and OpenSSL 0.9.8
>
hmm the way i read the patch and some history behind it appearing in the
rpm.spec, it was added to support openssl v1.1 on FC11 and FC12 platforms. A
very cursory glance over the changes when I sent the original email about
this seemed to point to new/renamed methods / members in openssl1.1
FWIW, http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1539
________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead"
Jorge Luis Borges.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
