the CD version will be out
soon.
;0)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael
Dauer
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:09 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Re: Restoring to a Running Linux System
Mich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael
Dauer
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 6:40 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Re: Restoring to a Running Linux System
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Michael Dauer wr
Quoting Michael Dauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I guess I need more the bacula-fd if I want to recover the backup server - at
least space for all bacula daemons and console, sqlite, and the catalog.
I haven't attempted recovery of the backup server itself, yet. But it
should be
doable by booting
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Michael Dauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > But I think most people here are doing sth like this. Isn't there a CD image
> > with 2.6 kernel available which was prepared by somebody who has a better
> > idea of what he is doing than I have.
>
> What Linux di
Michael Galloway wrote:
> Moin Michael!
>
> not, so, the current knoppix cd does indeed support 2.6.x:
I still don't find a CD image of version 4.x on knoppix.org. AFAIK version 3.x
is based on kernel 2.4.x.
/M
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored
Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In principle you are right, but personally, I would be a bit nervous
restoring
a 2.6 system using a 2.4 kernel. For example, there are often new features
added to newer kernels -- e.g. ext3 probably was not in kernel 2.2, so trying
to get back an ext3
>
> In principle you are right, but personally, I would be a bit nervous
> restoring
> a 2.6 system using a 2.4 kernel. For example, there are often new features
> added to newer kernels -- e.g. ext3 probably was not in kernel 2.2, so trying
> to get back an ext3 system would be a bit hard.
On Monday 12 September 2005 15:59, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Michael Dauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > But I think most people here are doing sth like this. Isn't there a CD
> > image with 2.6 kernel available which was prepared by somebody who has a
> > better idea
> > of what he is doi
Michael Dauer wrote:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
> The current Knoppix CD does not yet support a 2.6 kernel (only the DVD). As
> soon as the new CD is released I will build a bacula restore CD.
That's OK; it doesn't have to, unless your machine has hardware
installed which is supported only under a 2
Quoting Michael Dauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But I think most people here are doing sth like this. Isn't there a CD image
with 2.6 kernel available which was prepared by somebody who has a
better idea
of what he is doing than I have.
What Linux distribution are we talking about? Most Linux di
Moin Michael!
not, so, the current knoppix cd does indeed support 2.6.x:
The following "Highlights" are available on the download version of this
Debian-based (www.debian.org) CD or DVD:
* Linux-Kernel 2.6.x
* KDE V3.x as the standard desktop with K Office and the Konqueror
W
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Michael Dauer wrote:
> > Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > How can I filter this files out during restore? Should I just add it to
> > > > the exclude block of the files set?
> > >
> > > Given your recovery strategy, that would be the recommended approach, yes.
> >
Michael Dauer wrote:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>
>>>How can I filter this files out during restore? Should I just add it to the
>>>exclude block of the files set?
>>
>>Given your recovery strategy, that would be the recommended approach, yes.
>
>
> Sorry I was not very precise. I meant I want
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > How can I filter this files out during restore? Should I just add it to the
> > exclude block of the files set?
>
> Given your recovery strategy, that would be the recommended approach, yes.
Sorry I was not very precise. I meant I want to include the files during backu
14 matches
Mail list logo
